It should be clear by now that the mainstream media (MSM) have been pushing memes as to how Obama won a second term in office.
I find it curious that people who normally disregard the MSM now believe them when they say that fewer voters came out in favour of Romney than for McCain. Check Breitbart for six election day citizen’s journalism pieces which show that, from dawn to dusk, there were queues nationwide. (Read reports 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6.) It seems unlikely that these were for Obama, especially when a) ‘broken glass’ Republicans and independents were going out to vote and b) Romney rallies consistently had at least 10 times the number of people in attendance over Obama’s.
The other strange thing is how Romney’s Electoral College projections were 10 votes ahead of Obama’s until the early hours of the morning (UK time) and, suddenly, everything flipped to Obama. That was it for Romney.
When did Obama and his team ever believe he could win anything without cheating or intimidation? In 2008, it was by intimidating Hillary Clinton’s delegates to give their votes to his candidacy prior to the Democratic National Convention. Yet, Hillary had more popular caucus votes than he. (See We Will Not Be Silenced. The episodes are available here.)
Earlier, back in Illinois in 2004, he and his team smeared GOP opponent Jack Ryan (by getting Ryan’s divorce records unsealed — ironic) then the Roman Catholic beliefs of his subsequent opponent Alan Keyes; Obama won the race for US Senator that year based not on any policy differences but through a dirty campaign. Eight years before, in 1996, Obama managed to push all his Democratic opponents off the primary list — including his own mentor Senator Alice Palmer — leaving him unopposed in his own party and victorious in a heavily leftist district.
Even in 2008, Obama’s team didn’t seem to mind voter intimidation going on in cities like Philadelphia.
There is also another angle. I have read in several places that Obama had no acceptance speech planned. Romney had no concession speech. This opens up the possibility that people behind the scenes had a vote flipping operation put into place. Of course, one name always pops up in the picture, although there are no doubt more who would like to see the United States reduced to serfdom by a bunch of feral neo-Bolsheviks.
Before I go further into vote flipping, I would like to share other reactions from around the web, some of which are from Hillary’s PUMAs — the last comment coming from an immigrant who later became an American citizen (emphases mine):
– The GOP — and Romney/Ryan — had to fight the media as well as the Dems (The Right Sphere):
Small, petty politics won. More specifically, our inability to combat small petty, politics won. We are an ideological movement. We have principles we hold on to. The left simply does not. They hold no truths to be self-evident. They have no moral compass. They will lie, cheat, and steal for their movement. We will not.
What won last night was marketing. What won last night were communications strategies. Our ideology didn’t lose. Our ideology was never heard. It was drowned out by a media more focused on gotchas and Big Bird and binders and feeding a narrative created by the masters of marketing: Obama For America. The media won’t allow an ideological battle because every time they do, they lose …
So stop the finger pointing. Stop the “I told you sos.” WE didn’t lose the election. Marketing WON the election. And we’d better figure out how to outdo the marketing machine fast or it is really really over.
– The possibility of collusion between pollsters, media, the Democratic National Committee, then a behind-the-scenes vote flip which would enable a palatable anti-GOP rationale for Romney’s loss to be presented to the public. From PUMAs:
wyntyre: I believe I am right about the impossible numbers. Just an hour or so before Florida started leaning for [Obama] one of the biggest [Obama fans] out there, Chuck Todd, said BOTH parties expected Florida to go for MR. Even the pollsters have been saying that for months. The media was complicit in the POS’s victory. It has been obvious from day one, when [ABC’s George] Stephonapoulos brought up contraception at the January primary debate. This was all coordinated. And covert … I do not believe Mitt did not take Florida.
Erica: It does seem fishy to me, too. All the indicators you mentioned were there, and then the blowout for O. I don’t trust his Chicago machine and am starting to believe we’ll never have a fair election in this country again.
gxm17: Everyone in my family who voted for Obama absolutely believed that Romney would win. That’s sure what it *felt* like. That’s where the energy was coming from. I didn’t see any excitement or energy coming from ObamaNation, only fear and anger. Now they are giddy with relief. And they don’t even see the blood on their hands. Ah, ignorance is bliss!
angienc: [Mitt] wasn’t prepared for the massive cheating – the MSM is pretending it is because DailyKos/SEIU poll, PPP & Nate Silver were “right” (and all the other polls were wrong) but that’s the cover story (and unfortunately people on the right are falling for it too).
Obama lost almost 10 million votes [compared with] 2008 yet lost almost NONE of his votes in the important swing states.
Nothing fishy there at all.
votermom: I was born in a dictatorship that was nominally “democratic.” The President, under international (ahem USA) pressure, would hold elections. There would be massive crowds for the opposition challenger, than mysteriously the results would show overwhelming votes for the dictator. He never officially lost an election. The media would always cover this up for him – never criticized him.
I saw the crowds for Mitt Romney. I saw the handfuls of diehards for Obama. I saw the poll skewing – Obama needed to exceed 2008 turnout to break even with Romney. Did Obama exceed 2008 turnout? No he did not. Obama lost 9 Million voters! But in the key battleground states, he got more votes than Mitt Romney. Somehow Obama voters in battleground states were more pumped than ever to vote for Obama?
I’m not the only one whose spidey sense is tingling. These are not plausible numbers, these are 3rd world dictatorship … election numbers …
To clarify my hypothesis of vote flipping, only a few people in the background could know about it. Otherwise, the secret risked exposure. I do not believe that Obama knew, because he appeared as surprised as Mitt Romney did. This action was done independently of Obama and most of his water carriers, even though they had hoped for this result. I believe that what people saw on the ground with voter irregularity and intimidation was but a small part of the hypothetical vote flipping.
Historically, improved technology has improved the potential for vote flipping. Most states now use electronic machines with a touchscreen facility or a vote scanner. Devvy Kidd went back into the archives to find out how these machines work and why they are a risk to the democratic process, a brief excerpt of which follows:
Dr. O’Halloran … confirmed by contacting Doubleday Publishing of Kalamzaoo, Michigan which sells the GES “Accu-Vote system, “A programming technician matter-of-factly told me that there are modems inside each of the vote counting computers which are used to transfer results from dozens of precincts to computer counting computers. They talk between modems. There is a modem between each computer unit.” This means the voting counting computers can talk to a central computer mainframe and are vulnerable to outside access. Dr.O’Halloran went on to say, “The Doubleday technician explained that special command cards can be inserted into the machine to tell the precinct computer to call the central computer with results. According the technicians, “You have to program the phone number into the card, the card accesses the modem and the card tells it to dial into the central computer. To close the election you slide the ‘ender-card’ – like a special ballot – which has certain codes on it and tells it to lock up the election.”
GES isn’t the only manufacturer of these internal modems. Dr. O’Halloran further investigated a Florida based company, Optech, and found the following on its web site: “Modem communications and results transfer capability from the precinct with the OPTECH III-P Eagle and regional accumulation with the Smart Pack Receiving System.” This alarmed O’Halloran because “the presence of an internal (hidden) modem which could allow outside access to the computer without anyone’s knowledge.” At that point, Dr. O’Halloran contacted Ronnie Dugger, author of a highly acclaimed November 1997 article in New Yorker about computerized election fraud. For those who are interested, you can read one of Dugger’s articles here; another detailed article on vote rigging via these insidious machines is here.
“A modem in an election computer would be highly suspect,” Dr. O’Halloran quoted Dugger. “You can’t insulate a computer from outside communication if you have a modem in it. There would be a sub-routine (in the source-code) program which would cause the results being turned into the central computer to be phoned to you too, so that you could find out how many votes you needed to steal the election.”
A number of electronic machines used in the United States for last week’s election came from Smartmatic, a Venezuelan company which, in 2005, bought the American company which makes the machines — Sequoia Voting Systems. This CNN video tells us that when Chicago used these in an earlier election, Venezuelan technicians were on hand to rectify any problems.
The Sequoia/Smartmatic machines, not surprisingly, use their own (proprietary) software. This makes it nearly impossible to discern whether their voting systems are tamper-proof. These machines cannot be audited. Furthermore, the foreign ownership of the voting machines raises the question as to foreign ownership of American elections.
‘Venezuela? Hugo Chavez?’ Funny you should ask. These machines were used in the country’s 2004 recall election. Some experts, the video says, allege that the machines were ‘manipulated’ in order to give strongman Hugo Chavez a victory when he was widely expected to lose. Yet, the day after the election, Chavez declared victory with 59% of the vote. One of Chavez’s ministers sat on the board of Smartmatic. A year later, Smartmatic purchased Sequoia. The rest, as they say, is history.
And, let us not forget that many of the votes were tabulated at the top level by SCYTL, a company based in Barcelona (Spain!).
We might never know what happened this year, but what all conservatives and small ‘l’ libertarians can do is keep pushing the message of integrity, God-given rights, success and autonomy for oneself and one’s family. It is to be hoped that four years from now — God willing, although anything is possible now — that Americans will have tired of a celebrity president and his policies:
While both candidates are controlled by the big banks, Romney would have slowly eased in their takeover. However, you have voted for their quick takeover – which will hit you like a ton of bricks. Since Congress has not changed, Obama will rule solely via Executive Orders, which will complete the shredding of the Constitution. As Obama closes down 1000 coal powered power stations and we’re forced to buy electricity from dirty plants in Mexico, get ready for your power and all other bills to go through the roof. Enjoy!
————————————–
On November 14, 2012, the RNC finally decided to help Lt Col Allen West contest election results in Florida. West is currently a congressman for his district and objects to the apparent vote fraud which occurred there, particularly in St Lucie County. The Florida Secretary of State, happily, is sending three auditors there to investigate vote tabulation.
Many occurrences of voter intimidation and machine anomalies have occurred. Barack Obama Voter Fraud is one site compiling various incidents from around the nation. WND has more, including one story about a voting machine technician from suburban Chicago who said that, on one touchscreen machine, a Romney vote gave an error message of ‘voter save failure’, which happened to him when he cast his own vote. The man said that the precinct worker on duty told him to ‘assume’ the vote registered for Romney. The technician asked to vote on another machine.
If you are interested in writing to your Secretary of State to dispute election tallies, visit The Competent Conservative for relevant contact details. Election results have not yet been certified, but time is running out.
————————————————
UPDATE — MONDAY, AUGUST 1, 2016: In an interview today with Alex Jones, Joel Skousen — political scientist, conservative commentator and retired US Marine fighter pilot — said that 2012 was the first year where election results were tabulated at the national level. They were counted at the state level, then sent to national level. Given the lengthy queues outside polling stations from early morning to late evening, it is highly possible that several million votes could have been shaved off so that Obama appeared to be the winner. If any state had objected, the officials at national level could have said that they tabulated what was submitted by that particular state. It would have been impossible to trace. This new national tabulation system is likely to be in place again in 2016.
If you are interested in knowing how votes can be flipped electronically, this 11-minute video is useful:
End of series on America’s 2012 elections – find the rest on my Marxism/Communism page
18 comments
November 17, 2012 at 3:41 am
Tom
I read there were precincts in Philadelphia that were 100% all votes in favor of Obama. I read that in Ohio maybe, there were some precincts showing 95%+. SF was for certain 86%+ tilted in one direction only completely down the ballot line, but for SF that truly is normal to turn out that way. These other places, I think something fishy was going on too, just my opinion too.
LikeLike
November 17, 2012 at 9:31 am
churchmouse
Thanks, Tom. It’s a shame that very little will be done about it.
LikeLike
November 17, 2012 at 6:51 pm
Tom
As a side note, also typical and not uncommon in SF, but on late Friday afternoon coming onto 5 pm end of business day, a huge crowd of men and women banded together were marching down the sidewalks the entire length of Montgomery Street toward the TransAm Pyramid Building and carrying huge signs declaring Women Of The World United, or something like that. The flags were bright glaring red with the slogans printed in bright yellow. Since they were large flags essentially, at least 1/4 of each flag/banner in the upper left corner were adorned with a huge yellow Communist Hammer and Sickle emblem. It was a large happy gathering of typical everyday SFers showing their strength in numbers and more evidence of why in SF, for every election, it is always lopsided with nearly 85% to 95% approval ratings for anything left-wing straight down the ballot. It’s also strong evidence that the communist colonies implanted in SF, Berkeley, Santa Cruz and other western US outposts are finally coming out of the dark and into the open now that they have free reign over the American people for the next four years, or longer, should the current presidency be extended indefinitely at some point.
LikeLike
November 17, 2012 at 7:00 pm
churchmouse
Thanks for that glimpse of everyday life in the Bay Area. Call me
Arnold HorshackVinnie Barbarino, but ‘I’m so confused’.I do not understand why the Left sees the need to protest when they’re the victors. Another example — Valerie Jarrett saying the Administration would go after everyone who opposed them. Why? The Dems won. Game over. What revenge does one have to take and what demonstrations does one have to stage when, uhh, ‘The One Won’?
LikeLike
November 17, 2012 at 7:32 pm
Tom
I don’t think it was so much a protest as it was a celebration and normalization technique. The crowd was in a high mood of emotion as per their behavior, almost celebratory and Montgomery Street is the heart of the financial district, akin to the Wall Street of the West Coast, so it was a kind of in your face celebration, was what I got from seeing it. Again, it is common and weekly at least somewhere in the city to have the Communist Hammer and Sickle on display in some way or form along with propaganda of all sorts, blatant and with pride.
(I can even remember a job interview once where the interviewer showed me a favorite photo of the business owner, taken from inside Red China, with the Hammer and Sickle flag the highlight of the photo and asking me to my face, how I felt about the photo while grinning at me, waiting for my response. Needless to say I did not get the job, so I must not have answered appropriately enough to be considered. And such testing of loyalty to communist interests is common-place for employment in SF – testing for communist loyalties, pro-abortion and pro-gay loyalties, anti-smoking and health-fascists loyalties – these are all litmus tests one must go through in order to pass the hurdles and be employable these days in the city of SF and larger Bay Area.)
LikeLike
November 17, 2012 at 7:35 pm
churchmouse
That’s so depressing. However, I am grateful that you continue to reveal the reality of the SF Bay Area. Keep the stories coming, because, otherwise, no one would believe the grim truth. There really is evil in the world today, and what you relate proves it.
LikeLike
November 17, 2012 at 2:11 pm
Cyril
Thanks for posting; very timely and very relevant. Many people noticed the quirkyness in this election, from the obvious Romney rally and and dominance in enthusiasm and energy – to his sudden and spectacular drop in election night returns. Hopefully, enough local reports will emerge so as to allow a much more intensive look into the prospects of vote flipping. Most of us know little-to-nothing of this technology. The mainstream media will be as useful as ever in this; it will need to enter through the alternative media until it reaches critical proportions.
LikeLike
November 17, 2012 at 6:08 pm
churchmouse
Thanks, Cyril. You hit it on the head in your last sentence — ‘it will need to enter through the alternative media’ first. Only then will it enter MSM. Much like Benghazigate — big on the alternative media circuits, small on MSM (although Fox did try to bring it to the public’s attention before the election).
I understand via various comments I have read online that Fox has been brought to bear — i.e. become more ‘mainstream’ left. Hmm. They’ll lose market share, seeing as they are leaders right now. I have also read various viewers complaints online comparing The Five unfavourably to Glenn Beck’s former slot at the same time. Beck was cancelled for a reason — and not a good one.
LikeLike
November 17, 2012 at 6:30 pm
churchmouse
More weird — and almost unbelievable — reasons why the GOP caves in on investigating voter fraud. This is like a plot in a bad novel:
http://fellowshipofminds.wordpress.com/2012/11/15/why-the-gop-will-not-do-anything-about-vote-fraud/
This dates back to 1981. One elderly judge renews it repeatedly. Another, a younger ‘AA’, is keeping watch.
Does the GOP not have a backbone?
Meanwhile, it seems perfectly acceptable for the Dems to commit voter fraud with impunity? GOP — all of you — get a grip, for heaven’s sake!
LikeLike
November 17, 2012 at 7:04 pm
churchmouse
Full documentation here (start at page 13):
http://law.justia.com/cases/federal/appellate-courts/ca3/09-4615/09-4615-2012-03-08.html
As people elsewhere have pointed out — this pertains to the RNC (and their ‘agents’) specifically. Anyone or any organisation independent of them can raise an objection — it would seem. Somehow this decision must be overturned.
You can see how the Dems have run amok with this over the past three decades.
Pffft.
LATER EDIT: I did read elsewhere that any objection should be in by Monday, as states will declare official voter turnout on Tuesday, Nov. 20.
LikeLike
November 18, 2012 at 6:21 pm
Tom
I will put in a link to an article that is a bit of a book review on a new book out called “Crazifornia: Tales from the Tarnished State—How California is destroying itself and Why It Matters to America.”
The new book apparently tries to explain how CA has become a one-party progressive-only governed state and what that has led to in terms of economics, politics, taxation, quality of life and so forth.
So this might explain additional facts of what has been happening inside CA and how in extremist-progressive breeding-ground social-engineering-experimental cities, such as SF, this sort of planning is continually being experimented and tweaked and then pushed onto all of CA – and as the author explains, eventually onto all of the US – which is another thing we may be seeing as the result of this last election.
Bearing in mind that SF’s and then CA’s extreme anti-smokerism has now spread itself across the US and the entire globe, then it would be worth noting what else the left-wing social-engineers have been planning and are soon to begin spreading elsewhere, including worldwide, since the long term goal of any extreme-leftist-prog/comm activity was always from inception to rule worldwide, the whole world, not just part of it.
Book review and article is at:
http://factsnotfantasy.blogspot.com/2012/11/california-is-destroying-itself-us-is.html
LikeLike
November 18, 2012 at 6:33 pm
Tom
Additional information on CA one-party progressivism coming out of CA and winding its way across the US to destroy the US next can be found at:
http://crazifornia.com/category/the-blog/
LikeLike
November 18, 2012 at 10:40 pm
churchmouse
Something very pathological with California, the US and the world. Thanks so much for these links, which I haven’t seen — and, I suspect, nor have my readers.
Pay close attention, friends, and learn from the West Coast (mistakes aplenty).
Tom, even though I believe that God has left your state to its own devices, I am sure that He will continue to bless you as part of His remnant and, when necessary, guide you out to a Promised Land. May He keep you close to Him and, in the meantime, give you strength and fortitude.
LikeLike
November 20, 2012 at 1:13 am
churchmouse
Hello, Tom — A new day and a new gem for you (emphases mine):
http://pjmedia.com/instapundit/157990/
‘November 19, 2012
‘CALIFORNIA: What happens when Dems get everything they want. “The California Republican Party is functionally dead. And how is California doing, now that liberals have successfully terminated the state’s remaining conservatives?” #1 in debt, #1 in welfare, #1 in taxing the rich. And hoping for a federal bailout, I suspect. As is Illinois, which is in similar straits for similar reasons. “One-third of all the nation’s welfare recipients live in the state, despite the fact that California has only one-eighth of the country’s population. That’s four times as many as the next-highest welfare population, which is New York. Meanwhile, California eighth-graders finished ahead of only Mississippi and District of Columbia students on reading and math test scores in 2011.”’
Read through the more recent posts of Crazifornia – the blog and have created a new section to my ever-groaning list of sites. Find it at the bottom under ‘US politics’. Thanks for the link — I’ll be following it with interest.
LikeLike
November 20, 2012 at 4:17 am
Tom
The Instapundit analysis seems to concur with most others going around these days, too bad nobody began noticing it sooner on, before it got so bad. It is probably too late to expect any kind of turn-around for CA and if as CA goes, so goes the nation, then that bodes well for everyone. It may have been productive, years earlier, the way the prog/comm/left likes to leave the environs of CA and the like and protest on DC, protest at other locations, outside of CA – that in response there could have been a more balanced and conservative wave of protests sent from all these other places, directly into the heartland of the prog/comm/leftists, namely SF, LA, Berkeley, Sacramento, other leftist-held hot-spots all over CA. Had that been done earlier on, like with the smoke-bans for example, then it may have deterred them from spreading outward and infecting others parts of the US and world. As it is now, unfortunately, for Californians who are true-believers in the lib/comm/prog way of rule, they are blind to what everyone outside that small rigid way of thinking can see obviously as destructive and dictatorial. Instead, those who are existing inside the lib/prog/comm bubble are oh-so-believing in the false-goodness of what is essentially evil, the false-diversity of what is essentially rigid conformity and false-life-giving utopian hopes which are nothing more than pure kisses of death, of the mind, of the body and of the soul, for all infected with the plague.
LikeLike
November 20, 2012 at 8:34 pm
churchmouse
Too right, Tom. Unbelievable that a society — California — can care more for smoking bans than proper education.
Also, my readers — including you — can probably sense from the occasional comment I receive that the non-carbonated soft drink imbibers are out in force (an insult to Kool-Aid and have read that it was actually another rival brand). What they expect to achieve by commenting on small government-traditional values blogs, one can only wonder.
These smoking bans were the beginning of it all, you’re absolutely right. I can hear them now: ‘Hey, it’s only a minority of people now, right? Let’s put the screws to ’em.’ Start, like the Nazis did, with less than a quarter of the population and let rip.
I read somewhere the other day about why the leftist elites do it. Answer? Because they can. With impunity.
LikeLike
November 20, 2012 at 4:19 am
Tom
Correction/Edit:
“… and if as CA goes, so goes the nation, then that bodes well for everyone. ”
s/b:
“… and if as CA goes, so goes the nation, then that bodes not so well for everyone else. “
LikeLike
November 20, 2012 at 8:27 pm
churchmouse
Thanks, but no worries here. Unless it’s a real grammar police thing, i.e. where it should be ‘fewer’ instead of ‘less’, it doesn’t matter, but I appreciate your attention to detail — rather unCalifornian, therefore, all the rarer! 😉
LikeLike