The Puritan Board forum has a good discussion on mind-altering drugs and the Bible.
A member asked why Scripture is silent about these substances. Another long-time forum member, Steve Rafalsky, who attends a Presbyterian Church of America in Astoria, Queens, replied with much to say on the topic. And, no, the Bible is not silent on the matter.
Rafalsky took drugs in the 1960s and became a Christian when he saw how destructive the counterculture lifestyle was. His comments come highly recommended, particularly to readers under the age of 50.
In commenting on the 1960s and the legacy of that decade, Rafalsky says, in part (emphases mine):
That drug culture killed a lot of people, and drove many others mad, and influenced the mental and spiritual consciousness of collective humankind by opening a terrible Pandora’s box – an interdimensional gateway, if you will – allowing direct demonic influence to enter the archetypal human heartlands by means of these sorcerous drugs. Many pagans are aware of these things (though not from the Christian view which discerns the evil), but most of the Christians not, which will be a grave handicap in maintaining holiness in the church, seeing as we are growing so lax in letting the world into our sanctuary.
The United States changed forever. This is happening in Europe, too:
… much as Tolkien’s “shadow of Mordor” encroaching upon all of Middle Earth, or the days of Noah where “the wickedness of man was great in the earth, and that every imagination of the thoughts of his heart was only evil continually . . . [and] the earth [was] filled with violence through them” (Gen 6:5,13) – and what was once a relatively pleasant world (and country, for those in America) to live in, became increasingly hostile and unjust, and the culture Babylonian, that is, seductive by means of its arts, entertainments, luxuries, comforts (while multitudes elsewhere languished in misery and want). The world became more beast-like with its wars everywhere, emerging police states even in the supposedly civilized West. Ethnic groups now fostered hatred toward other groups (cf Matt 24:7 – “nation shall rise against nation”, which in the Greek is ethnos shall rise against ethnos – people groups against people groups), and social fabrics increasingly disintegrated.
This odyssey / pilgrimage to the Heavenly home now became a trek through a gauntlet of violence, and not only that, but due to the increasing wickedness the Almighty meted judgments upon this Babylonian entity. The stench of the blood and pain of 96,000,000 babies murdered in the womb (in America alone) over the brief period of 41 years, along with the celebrating all manner of sexual perversions and sin drew from Heaven great wrath, and the days were to become hard.
Some of the Puritan Board’s younger readers think this is an overstatement, however, Rafalsky is writing a book which he will self-publish about a reformed drug user who backslides and then finally sees the horror of what it is before returning to the Church.
Rafalsky has a lengthy blog post, also on Puritan Board, which parents, guardians and youth pastors might find useful. In it, he addresses the many mentions of mind-altering substances and those who administer them.
Scripture, he says, used the following Greek words in ancient translations concerning drugs and those who administer them:
With regard to pharmakeia – BAGD 2nd Edition says, that in Rev 18:23 the meaning is “sorcery, magic”, and in Rev 9:21, “magic arts”. It also gives usages in many other classical and LXX readings, but for brevity I’ll limit it to the NT usage, and will in the following citations also.
Concerning pharmakon – drug – in classical use (it’s not used in the AV NT) there are 3 meanings: 1) “poison”, 2) “magic potion, charm”, and 3) “medicine, remedy”. These are on page 854a of Bauer, Arndt, Gingrich, and Danker’s, A Greek-English Lexicon of the New Testament and Other Early Christian Literature, 2nd Edition.
Pharmakos – “poisoner, sorcerer, magician”. These entries were all found on page 1917 of Liddell and Scott.
He explains that ‘sorcerer’ and ‘magician’ in this context are not the way we understand them today, but in Revelation are used to denote:
one who administers or uses a certain class of drugs to “enchant”, to cast a psychic spell upon by use of these drugs and accompanying demonic power. It doesn’t mean a deceiver – a liar – generally or even figuratively, but specifically one who uses sorcerous potions. Liars / deceivers are already classed separately in this listing. Likewise in Rev 22:15 where a similar Greek word, pharmakos, is used for sorcerer, with the same meaning as pharmakeus in 21:8, again with liars / deceivers named separately. In these verses the usage clearly refers to drug-using-and-promoting people, so at the very least it is quite possible pharmakeia / sorceries in Revelation 18:23 – “by thy sorceries were all nations deceived” – refers to drug-related activity and not deceptive practices.
To those who doubt the meaning, Rafalsky cites an additional source (underscore and emphases in the original):
Consider this item from The New International Dictionary of New Testament Theology, Vol 2, p. 558,
. . . pharmakos, magician (Rev. 22:15); pharmakeus, mixer of potions, magician (Rev. 21:8); pharmakeia, magic, sorcery (Gal. 5:20; Rev. 9:21; 18:23). The basic word pharmakon does not occur in the NT, but its meaning of medicine, magic potion, poison gives the underlying idea of the words. Potions include poisons, but there has always been a magical tradition of herbs gathered and prepared for spells, and also for encouraging the presence of spirits at magical ceremonies (cf. possibly the final sentence of Ezek. 8:17: “They put the branch to their nose”). Sorcery is classed among the works of the flesh in Gal. 5:20. [underlined and last bold and italicized emphases added –SMR]
He goes on to mention instances where hallucinogens are used in non-Christian religious rituals and explains:
we are confronted with a class of drugs that “induce magic spells” or, to put it in other words, whose affect in the consciousness enable the user to have profound mystical / spiritual experiences, as well as to come into the presence of spirit beings. This is not all of their possible effects, but enough to get us started in our examination. This is Biblically-defined “sorcery” – pharmakeia …
He adds:
when Scripture speaks in Revelation 9:21 of men refusing to repent of their “sorceries” (pharmakeia) in the time of the sixth trumpet and its judgments, and in Rev 18:23 of the judgment of the harlot Babylon for (among other things) her “sorceries” (pharmakeia) which deceived the nations – those centuries prior to the latter half of the 20th might not have understood the meaning and significance of the “sorceries” written of here, for sorcery and magic arts then were practiced in the dark, away from the view of society, hidden in all its aspects due to its evil nature, widespread condemnation, and severe penalties.
How true. But, what about recreational drugs, we ask? Rafalsky states:
People smoke or ingest marijuana to attain a psychological or psychic “high” – an elevated and enhanced state of consciousness – though some would deny calling this “high” as much a pharmakeia activity as a more spiritual awareness, or not even that, but only a psychological high, or simply an enhancement of the senses . To deny that pharmakeia can involve enhanced physical sensation and pleasure through this psychic “high” – to the exclusion of overt occultism – as well as said occult activity, is an attempt to dissociate their sinning from pharmakeia activity. But this is taking refuge in lies. We must recognize that to use sorcery to indulge in sensory pleasure is as much one of its activities as the seeking of psychic, occult, and spiritual experience.
He also points out (emphasis in purple mine):
The widespread acceptance of “getting high” – “the relative innocence of this harmless substance” (if used moderately, so the reasoning goes) – has made it seem like harmless fun indeed. Many argue on this basis and will not even hear the exposition of Scripture. It has been said that such exposition is “stretching the meaning of the Greek words” – even though the meaning is clear and unequivocal. There is no stretching of the meaning of pharmakeia; its lexical import is precise: illicit drugs used to enhance the awareness of the flesh, its senses, and its state of mind or consciousness, quickened to these ends by a psychic energy not the Holy Spirit, but such as enables souls to be influenced by the demonic, or, if they are closed to this possibility, to be influenced by the demonic while completely unaware of it – thinking their “fun” state is just a super lark. Though the demonic influence is there, affecting their psyche, and they [are] blind to it. That’s a dangerous deception. Some call this, “Reefer madness hysteria.” The watchman on the wall is but called to cry out the danger approaching. We are responsible for heeding the cry.
He sums up scriptural references to drugs this way:
What we see is that there are different “levels” of Biblically-defined sorcery: occultic, spiritual, psychic high, and sensual pleasure. The enhancement by means of psychedelic agents constitutes them all pharmakeia activities.
This also includes most forms of cannibis, with the exception of those which have the THC removed, and, therefore, the high.
Rafalsky goes on to deplore the laxist attitude of Christians and clergy who say that there is nothing wrong with mind-altering drugs. On the contrary, he posits that taking them is spiritual fornication, which Scripture condemns. Of the 1960s, he says (emphasis mine):
There was an event (the term now used for military-scale biological, chemical, or nuclear events) that befell the entire world through the drug-energized sixties generation in America, as this potent counterculture permeated the nations of the world through its music, literature, art, film, and other culture-bearing vehicles. These nations and cultures of the world were leavened from within by the exciting new consciousness of the sixties and the Woodstock spirit exported into them, but it was a Trojan Horse filled with the denizens of Hell. Its impact was, in the psychic realm, the equivalent of a massive nuclear detonation. The “fallout” of this “detonation” came in the presence of malign spirits and their influence upon the new thinking: it became (seemingly) obvious to all that real vitality was not to be found in the Christian faith but in the relativity of postmodernism – the validation of everyone’s subjective truths and beliefs – and thus was the world made ripe for satanic deception on an unprecedented scale.
And:
The damage done is irreversible. The timetable of the Sovereign God is counting down. Across the non-Western world Christians are already under severe duress, persecution increasing daily. And the signs are that a groundswell is building up in the West – the mystery of iniquity and lawlessness – and that He who restrains it will not restrain it for long (2 Thess 2:6 ff.).
There is much more. Rafalsky might sound alarmist and heavy-handed, but he was immersed in the drug culture 50 years ago and know whereof he speaks.
The term ‘recreational drug’ only became part of popular parlance around that time. Yes, there were certain groups of people who used them before, but they were small subsets of society. During the latter half of the 20th century we saw an explosion in drug use. In the 21st century, we are now seeing legalisation of substances which have no place in a Christian lifestyle.
I would highly recommend Rafalsky’s research and thoughts, although they might need to be expressed differently to a young person.
That said, he proves that Scripture has much to say on the prohibition of mind-altering drugs.
10 comments
February 10, 2015 at 9:33 pm
Pooka
I appreciate your work here. To connect the “Pharm…” terminology with sorcery/magic is vital. It is not often put like this, but you have done well. This, sorcery in connection with mind altering substances or activities, is the root of magic – modern witchcraft and its like, and is immensely attractive to anyone who does not have a sufficient grasp of the One True God. I fell for it, myself, for ten long years, and even now, articles like this remind me of how little I’ve grasped of the depth to which I fell – and many have fallen.
I never did the drugs. Not once. This does not diminish the impact of what you’re writing here.
LikeLiked by 1 person
February 11, 2015 at 11:43 am
churchmouse
Thank you, Pooka.
I was the opposite of you, although my drug forays were few and far between — with no hallucinogens or heavy drugs, although some of my friends took LSD now and then. None of us was ever attracted by the occult.
However, I do remember a few of my classmates — acquaintances — from high school who smoked dope regularly and did start delving into the occult. It’s strange how one can bring on the other in some cases.
A few months ago I read a comment from someone on a secular site here in the UK who said that several years ago he took LSD and ‘saw God’. Even the secularists there told him he saw Satan. But I digress.
The content of Steve Rafalsky’s essay might be something to share with the kids when they get older. As I said to gw, Rafalsky also includes references from the Old Testament. God’s people took the issue of hallucinogens seriously and forbade them.
I have read on a couple of other Protestant sites that drugs are ‘sorcery’, but, thankfully, Rafalsky helpfully unpacked the reasons why by going through the biblical definitions of the ‘pharm’ words. Personally, I think every Christian high school should do the same with their older students (e.g. family or ethics class). Bottom line: drugs and drunkenness remove us, however temporarily, from the Holy Spirit’s guidance. And we know where that leads.
LikeLiked by 1 person
February 10, 2015 at 9:58 pm
gw
Thank you for this in-depth putting it all together in a single article. This has been the center of my ministry for many years in faith-based drug/alcohol rehab. The fact it is still growing world-wide,, including the countries that were the former bastions of Christianity, is simply chilling!
LikeLike
February 11, 2015 at 11:31 am
churchmouse
It is indeed chilling, gw. The 1960s ‘peace and love’ message, which included sex as well as drugs, was seductive, even for a number of our elitist elders commenting in the media at the time. Hmm. Now we have an intractable situation: teenage pregnancy, drug dealing, rampant crime and single-parent homes. Cities no longer have neighbourhood cohesion.
It is even sadder that anyone born from the mid-1970s onward will think that this is a normal state of affairs, as if the world were always like this. I was disappointed by the reaction Steve Rafalsky got on the Puritan Board thread, but they are younger readers who probably think he is overstating the case. After all, this dysfunctional world is all they know. Yet, you, I and others who remember, will be cognisant of the drastic social and moral change between 1960 and 1970 — nothing short of shocking.
May God continue to bless you abundantly in your work, because it is not easy. I know a psychiatric nurse in France who worked increasingly in the latter part of her career with drug addicts (the majority of admissions to her clinic); she was physically assaulted and verbally abused. She has since retired, exhausted. Similarly, the Revd Patrice Gourrier, based in Poitiers, has said more than once on RMC (Radio Monte Carlo, Paris) that most of the young people who come to him for addiction counselling — he is also a qualified psychotherapist — have psychosis brought on by drugs. Not surprisingly, he and my friend are very much opposed to legalising drugs.
If you haven’t read Steve Rafalsky’s full essay, you might find it of interest, as he does go into the Mosaic prohibitions against hallucinogens. There is a verse in Deuteronomy that says those who take them must be sentenced to death. So, such substances did exist and they were taken seriously. By mentioning this, it should not be inferred that a death sentence is advocated today, rather that taking drugs has been viewed as being far from recreational historically.
In that it removes the drug taker from the Holy Spirit, getting out of one’s box — as a friend of mine used to put it — should be avoided at all costs. No doubt this is why the Bible also condemns drunkenness.
LikeLiked by 1 person
February 10, 2015 at 11:28 pm
chrisaomministries
This is extremely well written and researched. Thank you! C
LikeLike
February 11, 2015 at 10:57 am
churchmouse
You’re most welcome.
Thank you for stopping by to read and comment. May God continue to bless your ministry.
LikeLike
February 11, 2015 at 2:00 am
Andrew
I have great idea –
let’s bring Rastafarian Ganja-culture into the Reformed church.
(Oh – whoops… someone already had that thought):
http://open.salon.com/blog/con_chapman/2014/11/02/rasta-byterians_bring_new_life_to_old_congregation
I wrote a limerick to that (very high church) effect: http://tinyurl.com/nczmswf
LikeLike
February 11, 2015 at 10:50 am
churchmouse
What a relief to discover that Open Salon is a spoof site. There is no Wharton, Massachusetts, and the First Presbyterian Church pictured is in Alameda, California:
http://www.alamedainfo.com/Alameda_CA_Postcards_6.htm
LikeLiked by 1 person
February 12, 2015 at 12:47 am
Linda Bowling
I think there are problems with some prescription drugs, also. Especially depression drugs.
LikeLike
February 12, 2015 at 1:00 am
churchmouse
I agree. However, people take them in good faith, trusting the medical community, such as it is.
That said, to clarify, I have several posts on the subject, which are on my Recipes/Health/History page:
Clinical trials for prescription drugs
Nortriptyline versus smoking: when the cure is worse than the ‘disease’
Eszoplicone for sleepless nights — how about warm milk instead?
Zolpidem sleeping tablets — read side effects list carefully
Prescription drugs essential to gun control debate — look at Paxil
Psychotropic drugs contribute to mass shootings
SSRIs can affect behaviour — suicide, cutting, drink, drugs, violence
Professor Philippe Even’s The Truth about Cholesterol (and statins)
THINCS: More debunking of the cholesterol myth
British cardiologist’s warning about statins
Some of these warn about psychological effects, others about physical ones.
I very much appreciate your reading and staying on to comment. Many thanks.
LikeLiked by 1 person