Until a few days ago, I’d never really thought much about the piano.
My maternal grandparents had an upright, which my late mother and aunt learned how to play. My late paternal aunt owned and played a Yamaha baby grand. I could read music and play a bit myself.
However, lifting the lid off the piano reveals a world of science and nature many of us haven’t contemplated.
The French newsweekly Marianne recently reported on the intricacies of the piano, from sound to brand dominance (‘Un Steinway, sinon rien?’ [‘A Steinway or nothing?’] by Emmanuel Tresmontant, 24 – 30 April 2015, pp. 80-83).
Hundreds of manufacturers, now gone
There was a time when every Western nation — even a US state — had its own piano manufacturer. Wikipedia has a nearly complete list here. (My grandparents had a Gulbransen, not included.)
Very few of them are still in business. A handful of survivors have moved production to the Far East.
The French manufacturer Pleyel was the most recent to stop production. That was in 2013.
Interestingly, around the time Pleyel was winding down, a new company in England, Cavendish Pianos, launched. Named after the Duke and Duchess of Devonshire, Cavendish being their family name — and partly financed by them — the company makes five models from uprights to grands. They are located at Bolton Abbey in Yorkshire and use the county’s finest expertise, wood and wool in manufacture.
However, most of us know only the Steinway and Yamaha brands. And there’s a reason for that. More in a moment.
What classical composers used
The Marianne article tells us that in the 19th century, Paris had over 100 piano manufacturers (p. 81).
The pianos were made in various shapes depending on the sound desired: pear, pyramid, cube and even a giraffe! Some pianos were able to indefinitely carry the sound of one note played until the person playing lifted his finger. If you try this today, you’ll be disappointed. The sound fades out even with your finger on the key.
Pleyel pianos were developed by the classical composer Ignaz Pleyel. He introduced the upright model to France in 1815. This piano was developed from models popular in Britain at the time. By 1834, Pleyel et Cie employed 250 workers who constructed 1,000 pianos each year.
Chopin composed and played on a Pleyel, said to have a singing sound quality. Liszt used a piano made by rival Erard, thought to have been even better in tonality. Pleyel bought Erard and another pianomaker Gaveau in the 1980s.
Today, only a few models made by these companies and others around the world exist. The classical pieces we hear today from other pianos lose some of the earlier subtleties in the original compositions.
Steinway’s world dominance
These days, most concert pianists play a Steinway, the leading brand of piano.
French music critic Alain Lompech explained Steinway’s evolution, which began in the 1800s (p. 81):
The genius of Steinway & Sons, founded in New York in 1853 by Heinrich Steinweg, a German, was to take the best innovations of the other manufacturers and integrate them in a harmonious unit. At the first Universal Exposition in Paris in 1867, Steinway took three gold medals from Pleyel and Erard. The most unbelievable bit is that Steinway pianos are made the same as they were in 1880! Nothing has changed since the patents were granted. It’s an absolute miracle.
Philippe Copin, arguably one of Europe’s best piano technicians, told Marianne why Steinway dominates the market (p. 82):
Steinways distinguish themselves by their capacity for resonance. They can project sound in concert halls with 3,000 seats, which had never been done before. Steinway also knew how to accommodate from the start the demands of composers such as Liszt, Prokofiev and Rachmaninov who needed more percussive pianos: a fortissimo from Prokofiev does not have the same impact as one from Mozart or Beethoven.
Copin adds that few professional pianists know how to get the best from a Steinway:
They don’t know how it’s made and how this affects its timbre. Most often, they all ask for the same thing: that their piano be adaptable and allow them to play all repertoires … In order to respond to all these demands, it has been observed that only one brand can meet them: Steinway! Add to that that a grand piano for concerts costs €140,000 whatever the marque. You then understand why there is so little diversity.
Marianne points out that other manufacturers ended up trying to imitate Steinway to meet the demands of pianists. For example, the sound from the Austrian make Bösendorfer started out as ’round and soft, deep’ (p. 82). Not so long ago, concert pianists complained that Bösendorfer wasn’t powerful enough, so the maker altered its hammers in response, resulting in a ‘hard and metallic’ sound.
Incidentally, Yamaha bought Bösendorfer in 2007.
Musicologiest Ziad Kreidy told Marianne that he is sorry the original sounds which distinguished one piano manufacturer from another are history (pp. 82, 83):
… to satisfy demand on a global scale, piano manufacture has become extremely automated and standardised.
Modern pianos have such heavy, sonorous and rich basses that it’s impossible to respect the pedals played, for example, by Chopin in some of his Nocturnes.
This also holds true for Beethoven’s Concerto No. 3:
On a modern Steinway Beethoven’s instrumentation is impossible to achieve. A too-insistent resonance ruins the sound and the interplay becomes cacophony. On an old Pleyel, by contrast, you had only to respect the pedal indications for the melody to unfold naturally.
He went on to say (p. 83) that, previously, each manufacturer had their own notion of tonal
warmth, clarity and the natural which made the reputations of Pleyel and Erard, handmade by passionate artisans, depositors of a savoir-faire completely lost now …
With these instruments, as rare as they are fragile, we enter into another poetic universe. The sound is natural, round and golden, as if it were amber.
Concert virtuoso Alain Planès was fortunate enough to play a 1836 Pleyel which he said sounded
totally authentic … exactly as Chopin intended.
He was also able to record Debussy’s Préludes on an 1897 Bechstein which left his heart pounding with excitement.
Yamaha, the only real rival
Marianne noted that, whilst the Italian manufacturer Fazioli and the German Bluthner still make ‘excellent’ pianos, Steinway’s only real rival is Yamaha, especially with their newest model, the CFX (p. 82).
Only time will tell.
Hammers and wool
Modern Steinways have much harder hammers than the old, beloved makes of piano (p. 83). This affects the sound quality, making it bold, percussive and heavy.
Another factor contributing to sound is the sheep’s wool felt used on the hammers. Alain Planès said that the late, great pianist Rudolf Serkin who died in 1991, surmised that modern felt is considerably different to that of the old days:
He thought that today’s sheep are badly nourished, that their wool no longer has the same quality as their ancestors’ and that this, naturally, has a direct influence on the sound coming from the piano.
An interesting theory, one which might be true.
It is interesting to note that the earliest covering on piano hammers was leather. Felt replaced leather. The first piano felt manufacturer was JD Weickert, based in Leipzig:
In 1847 the first felt for piano hammer was made in Germany by the Weickert factory. This felt was successful[ly] tested and used by the piano factory J.G. Irmler. Piano Felt Factory J.D. Weickert was the new name of the company.
The existing and newly founded Piano factories at that time caused an increasing demand for Piano Felt. Even today well-known companies as Steinway, Blüthner, Bösendorfer , Ibach, Bechstein or Rönisch were already customers of the Felt factory. The factory had to increase the capacity and had to add on new facilities. The number of staff increased by 50 in year 1860 to 350 employees at the beginning of the 20th century.
In the late 19th century, The Guardian tells us:
more people were employed making pianos in London than in any other manufacturing business.
Highly technical
None of us doubts that manufacturing a piano is an involved process.
So is being a piano technician. Philippe Copin spent ten years training at Yamaha’s factory in Japan. It can take a highly trained technician up to two days to properly tune and adjust a piano before a major concert (pp. 81, 82).
This video describes some of what is involved in adjusting individual key’s temperaments:
Wikipedia has an excellent entry on Boston’s Timothy Gilbert and his piano patents from the 19th century, which were very technical and highly successful.
The technology and mathematical calculations behind piano hammers is discussed here, complete with illustrations.
Today, at Cavendish Pianos, owner and founder Adam Cox told The Guardian that:
With each piano made up of as many as 20,000 parts, the suppliers include hardwood sawmills, feltmakers and a hand-spinner of piano strings, all within easy reach of the ex-cowsheds.
“China and the far east have many advantages but we can beat them,” says Cox, whose favourite statistic is a reminder of the glory days of British piano sales.
Whilst many reading this will say, ‘Keyboards get the job done, too,’ Cox says:
Keyboards and the like had a novelty but people are realising their limitations compared with a real piano.
When it comes to music, nothing’s grander than a grand — or even a standard upright piano! Expensive, yes, but well worth it. And now we know what’s under the lid.
8 comments
May 6, 2015 at 9:19 pm
The True Light!
This is a topic which is off of your regular path, isn’t it? However, you have tackled it with the same prowess as any spiritual matter! Very informative, good work!
~Steve
LikeLiked by 1 person
May 6, 2015 at 9:38 pm
churchmouse
Thank you, Steve — much appreciated!
Musical instruments interest me, and this article from a French magazine went much further into detail and honesty than most English-language ones, if, indeed, they ever write on the topic. I have often wondered why we only see Steinway pianos these days, and now I know. We also know that other piano makes had different sounds and that 19th century composers used those originally. Something to think about when we next watch a costume drama on PBS or attend a classical concert.
Some of what I report gives us facts, as well as stories, on which to dine out.
We benefit by knowing history, social movements and more in order to interact properly. We never know whom we might meet. My model comes from the old-family Episcopalians in the US and Anglicans in England who can converse on any topic easily with anyone. These are the people I have mixed with over the past 31 years. May the Lord bless them richly.
If more of us took an example out of their book, we would have much more interesting, interactive and cordial conversations. Some of my readers are there already. I hope to be someday!
LikeLike
May 6, 2015 at 9:20 pm
michaeljmcfadden
Whew! VERY well done … Thank you! I’d never really thought about ANY of this! When I saw the title of your piece in my email I thought “Hmmm…. I guess a string broke and she learned how to replace it?” LOL!
You’ve made me think of something though. We’re all familiar with Beethoven’s hearing problems, but has there ever been a famous composer who didn’t physically know how or was incapable of playing the piano themselves?
😕
Michael
LikeLiked by 1 person
May 6, 2015 at 9:53 pm
churchmouse
I don’t know, Michael, but I’ll check it out for the future!
Glad you liked the post — greatly appreciated!
The Steinway thing had been on my mind for a long time, probably for the past 20 to 30 years. I remember seeing Baldwin pianos on American television in the 1970s and 1980s, then they disappeared. I think our high school had a Chappell, a company that switched over exclusively to printed music a few decades ago and was later bought out by a multinational. It made me wonder what happened to all the other makes of pianos.
I had figured that all pianos sounded alike. Now we know that there were sounds for different marques, some better for certain compositions which don’t sound the same today. I also hadn’t realised that there was a piano buying boom in the late 19th to early 20th century. Some of those piano manufacturers had sunk everything into making player pianos. By the 1920s, that market had died.
LikeLike
May 7, 2015 at 4:09 pm
churchmouse
Tune in Friday evening (your time), May 8, for an answer to your question! 🙂
LikeLike
May 6, 2015 at 11:14 pm
The Gospel of Barney
Reminded me our upright needs tuned a Geo B Norris dated 1912 in Chicago!
LikeLiked by 1 person
May 6, 2015 at 11:28 pm
churchmouse
Love it!
If I remember your location rightly, I do not know if this will be of help, but this page has a tuner in Clancy, MT, and in the right hand column, other tuners in the state:
http://www.manta.com/c/mmgxhsb/a440-piano-service
Here is more information about George B Norris’s pianos:
http://antiquepianoshop.com/online-museum/norris-george-b/
From the link:
‘George B. Norris pianos were built by the Holland Piano Manufacturing Company of Menomonie, Wisconsin. George B. Norris was the president of Holland Piano Company, and many of their instruments were built under his name. A late-comer to the industry, the firm was established in 1913. George B. Norris built a full line of upright pianos, baby grand pianos, and player pianos. They were known for being of very good quality at an affordable price. Unfortunately, George B. Norris built pianos for less than 20 years, going out of business with the Great Depression. The firm was liquidated in 1931.’
Good luck with the tuning.
Let me know how it goes — any thread will do.
Remember when we were youngsters that blind men made expert piano tuners? Now that was equal opportunity. They knew what they were doing.
LikeLike
May 7, 2015 at 9:33 am
churchmouse
Found some info about the brand my grandparents owned, Gulbransen, which still makes pianos today.
Axel Gulbransen founded the company in 1904. Factories were located in Chicago and nearby Deerfield, Illinois.
By 1917, they were the largest maker of player pianos in the world. The slogan was ‘Easy to Play’ with adverts showing a toddler playing with the pedals.
In 1928, they also began making organs, which they evolved as times changed. In 1962, they introduced the world’s first transistor organ.
During the Second World War, the US government bought only two brands of pianos: Steinway and Gulbransen.
Gulbransen has had several owners over the past 60+ years. CBS owned them in the 1950s. In the 1960s, Gulbransen merged with Seeburg. In 1985, a venture capital firm bought the company. Today, QRS Technologies owns Gulbransen. Manufacture went to Samick in Korea in the 1980s.
Current line of pianos — smaller grands and uprights:
https://www.qrsmusic.com/gulbransen/pianos.asp
Pictures of organs and rhythm machines:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gulbransen
Company history:
https://www.qrsmusic.com/gulbransen/history.asp
http://antiquepianoshop.com/online-museum/gulbransen-gulbransen-dickenson-company/
http://www.concertpitchpiano.com/Gulbransen-Piano-Prices.html
http://www.bluebookofpianos.com/Depression.html
LikeLike