The three-year Lectionary that many Catholics and Protestants hear in public worship gives us a great variety of Holy Scripture.
Yet, it doesn’t tell the whole story.
My series Forbidden Bible Verses — ones the Lectionary editors and their clergy omit — examines the passages we do not hear in church. These missing verses are also Essential Bible Verses, ones we should study with care and attention. Often, we find that they carry difficult messages and warnings.
Today’s reading is from the English Standard Version with commentary by Matthew Henry and John MacArthur.
23 “When he was forty years old, it came into his heart to visit his brothers, the children of Israel. 24 And seeing one of them being wronged, he defended the oppressed man and avenged him by striking down the Egyptian. 25 He supposed that his brothers would understand that God was giving them salvation by his hand, but they did not understand. 26 And on the following day he appeared to them as they were quarreling and tried to reconcile them, saying, ‘Men, you are brothers. Why do you wrong each other?’ 27 But the man who was wronging his neighbor thrust him aside, saying, ‘Who made you a ruler and a judge over us? 28 Do you want to kill me as you killed the Egyptian yesterday?’ 29 At this retort Moses fled and became an exile in the land of Midian, where he became the father of two sons.
———————————————————————————————–
Today’s verses are a continuation of Stephen’s address to the temple court.
Stephen was one of the first deacons, whom the Apostles appointed along with five other holy and wise men from the Hellenist (Greek) Jews. Acts 6 gives us the account of how and why the Apostles chose them.
As the Church at this time was centred at the temple in Solomon’s Portico, the Jews, including the religious leaders, could see and hear thousands of converts every day. They knew that the Apostles were teaching and doing miraculous healing, the way Jesus did. The threat to the Jewish authorities was expanding. It was bad enough that Jews from Jerusalem were becoming followers of Jesus, but now Jews from other nations were, too.
Stephen was brought before the temple council to defend himself against four charges of blasphemy: blaspheming God, Moses, the law and the temple. Acts 7 contains his address and the council’s action against him.
Stephen first got the council’s attention by saying he had revered the same traditions as they and respected the history of the people of Israel. He related the story of Abraham, then of Joseph.
At this point, he accomplished two objectives: holding his audience’s attention and defending himself against the charge of blaspheming God.
As Stephen related his scriptural knowledge of the early patriarchs, he also indicted his audience for rejecting Jesus. His reason for mentioning Joseph was to get them to realise that Joseph’s brothers treated him the same way the Jews treated Jesus.
Stephen offered the first Christian apologetic: a defence of — reasoned case for — Jesus, in this case, as Messiah.
In last week’s verses, Stephen began his scriptural account of Moses: from the time of his birth through to his early adulthood. Please read that linked post if you haven’t done so, as it will help clarify today’s reading.
By the time Moses was born, several generations had passed since Joseph’s time. A new Pharaoh came to rule. He did not know the history of how the Israelites came to be there. Nor did he know the story of Joseph. Hence, he enslaved the descendants of the twelve patriarchs of Israel.
Despite having been adopted by Pharaoh’s daughter and educated in all the best Egyptian traditions, Moses never forgot that he was an Israelite. Aged 40, he decided it was time to meet his family members (verse 23).
Matthew Henry tells us of Moses at this point in time, as described in Acts 7:22: ‘mighty in his words and deeds’. Emphases mine below:
He became a prime minister of state in Egypt. This seems to be meant by his being mighty in words and deeds. Though he had not a ready way of expressing himself, but stammered, yet he spoke admirably good sense, and every thing he said commanded assent, and carried its own evidence and force of reason along with it; and, in business, none went on with such courage, and conduct, and success. Thus was he prepared, by human helps, for those services, which, after all, he could not be thoroughly furnished for without divine illumination. Now, by all this, Stephen will make it appear that, notwithstanding the malicious insinuations of his persecutors, he had as high and honourable thoughts of Moses as they had.
Stephen did not speak of Moses’s stammering, only his greatness. This was to clear himself of the charge of blaspheming Moses.
However, as with his account of Joseph, Stephen was trying to tell the Jewish court that their ancestors rejected leaders such as Joseph and Moses to their detriment. Stephen was using Joseph and Moses as comparative figures for Jesus. The Jews rejected Joseph, Moses and Jesus.
Through his apologetic, Stephen wanted to convince his audience that Jesus is Messiah.
Back now to our reading. Stephen said that Moses saw one of the Egyptians — probably a foreman — oppress one of the Israelite slaves. Moses, in turn, fatally struck the man (verse 24). Moses saw the Egyptian abuse one of his family members and wanted to avenge his kinsman.
Moses knew:
that his commission from heaven would bear him out …
However, he also worked on the assumption that his kith and kin would recognise that he was one of them and that he was sent to deliver them from bondage to the Promised Land (verse 25):
… he supposed that his brethren (who could not but have some knowledge of the promise made to Abraham, that the nation that should oppress them God would judge) would have understood that God by his hand would deliver them; for he could not have had either presence of mind or strength of body to do what he did, if he had not been clothed with such a divine power as evinced a divine authority.
But that was not the case.
The incident elicited a lot of talk because, when Moses returned to the slaves the next day, they were quarrelling (verse 26). Some must have been saying, ‘He did a good thing. Could he deliver us? Is he fulfilling the promise made to Abraham?’ Others no doubt took the opposite view, ‘Who does that guy think he is?’
Moses, wanting them to make peace, asked why they were quarrelling. Instead of responding rationally, the Israelite contending with his neighbour pushed Moses aside and asked who made him judge and ruler over them (verse 27). He went further by asking if Moses was going to kill him, too.
Henry warns us about people like this:
Proud and litigious spirits are impatient of check and control.
That response was Israel’s rejection of Moses. That Israelite who spoke to him so aggressively was stubborn and spiritually blind. That is what Stephen was trying to convict the Jewish court of: a similar but infinitely more serious rejection of Jesus.
John MacArthur says of Moses:
He had done the first thing. He had shown that he was going to defend them. But they didn’t get the message. They understood not. So blind, they were blind to their own redeemer, their own deliverer, the one who was going to take them to the Promised Land. It was the time of promise, verse 17 said it, and it was time to go, but they weren’t going to go because they weren’t going to accept the deliverer.
Jesus came and offered a kingdom. They didn’t accept the King. Did they get the kingdom? No, it was postponed. Moses came and said, “I’ll give you the Promised Land.” Did they get the Promised Land? Forty years later they got it. No, 80 years later, because they didn’t believe when the redeemer came the first time. Sounds familiar, doesn’t it?
Verse 26, “And the next day he showed himself to them as they strove.” He came down there and two of them were arguing. He not only came to defend them from their enemies, he came to make peace among them. He was the truest kind of deliverer. His plans were not only political, they were personal. He not only saw the deliverance of Israel as a nation, he saw himself as a peacemaker between individuals. That’s the heart of a real deliverer, isn’t it? Great man.
Thus rejected, Moses exiled himself to Midian, where he fathered two sons (verse 29). MacArthur tells us:
Remember his wife, Zipporah? He married her over there and he fiddled around in the desert for 40 years herding sheep.
Stephen’s point to the court about Moses was that God postponed Israel’s deliverance because they were stubborn, blind, aggressive and disobedient. He punished them with 40 more years of slavery and another 40 in the journey to the Promised Land. Many Israelites died during that time because they rejected Moses in the first place. Had they accepted him, they would have adhered to God’s timetable.
Although Stephen did not know this — he was the first martyr — their rejection of Christ resulted in the destruction of the temple decades later by the Romans in 70 AD: God’s punishment. It was never rebuilt.
Yet, although he was convicting his audience of spiritual blindness and brutal rejection, Stephen wanted to open their eyes, to give them insight into Jesus as Messiah. Stephen was saying, ‘Accept Jesus as I accept Him as the Deliverer, the Promised One, the Messiah’.
Henry says that, with this apologetic, Stephen cleared himself of blaspheming Moses. Furthermore, he indirectly warned the court not to reject his message about Jesus, the way their ancestors rejected Moses. Finally, he warned them, again indirectly, that if they did reject Jesus as Messiah, God would take Him away from them in favour of the Gentiles.
The next reading continues Stephen’s discourse on Moses.
Forbidden Bible Verses continues after Easter.
Next time: Acts 7:30-34
11 comments
April 2, 2017 at 1:21 am
OIKOS™-Redaktion
Reblogged this on Die Erste Eslarner Zeitung – Aus und über Eslarn, sowie die bayerisch-tschechische Region!.
LikeLike
April 2, 2017 at 2:54 pm
churchmouse
Thank you very much for the reblog!
LikeLike
April 2, 2017 at 2:30 pm
cookingflip
Two things according to Henry which I’m thinking about: 1) Did Moses really have the lawful right to struck the Egyptian (why did he then go in hiding after he was found out?)? 2) Is the destruction of the temple in 70 AD really as ‘punishment’? I thought it was for us to learn that worship is in spirit and in truth? Have a blessed Sunday, churchmouse.
LikeLike
April 2, 2017 at 2:54 pm
churchmouse
Thank you! I hope you have a blessed Sunday, too, cookingflip!
The destruction of the temple was divine judgement against the Jews of that time for rejecting Jesus:
http://www.truthaccordingtoscripture.com/documents/eschatology/significance.php#.WOEQL2e1ttQ
I don’t really understand the destruction of the temple and ‘learn that worship is in spirit and in truth’. Perhaps you can clarify.
‘When Pharaoh heard of it, he sought to kill Moses. But Moses fled from Pharaoh and stayed in the land of Midian.’ (Exodus 2:15) It sounds unlawful, doesn’t it? I’ve taken that bit of Henry’s commentary out of the post.
The main point, however, in Stephen’s apologetic is that the Jews rejected men God sent to them: Joseph and Moses. Stephen wanted to remind them of that and warn them about their continued rejection of Jesus.
Happy to discuss further.
LikeLike
April 2, 2017 at 3:15 pm
cookingflip
Thank you, churchmouse–I bookmarked the link/webpage and will read it a little at a time. Re worshipping in spirit and in truth–I was refering to John 4:21-24 (Jesus at the well with the Samaritan woman).
Thank you for the post, by the way. I hope to read later tonight the passage on Stephen. I think I used to fast-forward reading that part before, but now that you’ve written about it, I want to read it again!
LikeLike
April 2, 2017 at 3:33 pm
churchmouse
Thanks for the verses. I still don’t see the link between that passage and the temple, though.
Matthew 24, Mark 13 and Luke 21 are the go to chapters for the temple.
Luke 21 expresses it best, because it has separate sections about the destruction of the temple and of Jerusalem:
Jesus Foretells Destruction of the Temple
5 And while some were speaking of the temple, how it was adorned with noble stones and offerings, he said, 6 “As for these things that you see, the days will come when there will not be left here one stone upon another that will not be thrown down.”
Jesus Foretells Destruction of Jerusalem
20 “But when you see Jerusalem surrounded by armies, then know that its desolation has come near. 21 Then let those who are in Judea flee to the mountains, and let those who are inside the city depart, and let not those who are out in the country enter it, 22 for these are days of vengeance, to fulfill all that is written. 23 Alas for women who are pregnant and for those who are nursing infants in those days! For there will be great distress upon the earth and wrath against this people. 24 They will fall by the edge of the sword and be led captive among all nations, and Jerusalem will be trampled underfoot by the Gentiles, until the times of the Gentiles are fulfilled.
LikeLike
April 2, 2017 at 3:53 pm
cookingflip
I just noted the chapters from the 3 gospels and will read them as well later, thank you. Thanks for quoting some of the passages as well–I didn’t notice before the “days of vengeance” that Jesus mentioned.
Re the passage at the well in Samaria… I always thought the destruction of the temple was so that the sacrifices for atonement would no longer be carried out (ie, with Jesus’ sacrifice on the cross fulfilled), as were all the other offerings–because we are now God’s temple (ie, those who have the indwelling of the Spirit). Thus, we are now worshipping in “spirit and in truth”.But I need to do more study on this–with the Jews now intent to build the third temple, and some Christian groups supporting it (referring to prophecies in Ezekiel that are still not fulfilled), and the same Christians saying that even the Jews believe that they will be stopping the atonement sacrifices (but not the other offerings) when the Messiah comes (who they believe still has not come!). Sorry, did I confuse you?!
LikeLike
April 2, 2017 at 10:59 pm
churchmouse
Jesus’s interaction with the Samarian woman largely represented His taking His ministry to non-Jews. I purposely did not say Gentiles, because the Samarians abided by the Pentateuch, but they also had syncretic beliefs and the Jews avoided them.
That said, Jesus did tell the woman that Jerusalem would be destroyed. John MacArthur explains it well in this sermon on those verses:
https://www.gty.org/library/sermons-library/43-21/messiah-the-living-water-part-2
An excerpt follows from the middle of the page:
‘“An hour is coming”–and He says it again in verse 23–“an hour is coming and now already is when neither in this mountain nor in Jerusalem will you worship the Father.” Not long after this, a few decades, 70 A.D. comes. The Romans come at the end of the Jewish rebellion that started in 66 and the Romans come and they destroy Jerusalem and they crush the temple and don’t leave one stone upon another and there’s no more temple worship. And then the Roman powers go up into the area of Samaria. They arrive at Mount Gerizim and historical accounts tell us they took out their swords and they slaughtered thousands of Samaritans on Mount Gerizim and brought an end to that worship as well. Jesus is giving the prophecy of what’s coming and coming very fast, and it already now is in the sense that the New Covenant is almost in place. It’s not long until it be ratified in His death on the cross. Our Lord’s answer is a very crucial, crucial answer. Listen carefully to what I say.
‘Now Samaritan worship on Mount Gerizim was a corrupted form of Judaism. It had been established by an apostate Jewish priest who married the daughter of Sanballat who was the enemy of Nehemiah in the rebuilding of Jerusalem after the Babylonian captivity. It was a false religion. It had…it had Jewish elements to it, including the Pentateuch, and then it was all mixed up with the pagans who came in after the 722 captivity and intermarried with the remaining Jews in the northern kingdom.’
Two-thirds of the way down, MacArthur mentions the sign after the Crucifixion that worship would change to praising God in spirit and in truth:
‘Do you understand what happened at the death of Jesus Christ when the veil, sorting out the holy place from the Holy of Holies, was torn and ripped, shredded from top to bottom? Do you understand that that was the symbol of the end of the entire Old Testament system of external, ceremonial, symbolic worship? Do you understand at that moment it was over and our Lord is affirming this, and what He’s saying is this, there are no more temples, there are no more places of worship where God is to be sought and found? There’s no more priesthood. There’s no more altars. There’s no more sacrifices. There’s no more vestments. There are no more incense, candles, all that goes with it. Whether it is the ill-informed worship of the Samaritans or the apostate worship of the Jews, it all disappears, it all passes away. No more mountains, no more temples, no more priests, no more sacrifices, no more altars, no more vestments, no more feasts, no more Sabbaths, none of it–all that is ripped apart, disappeared. And the punctuation point was made in 70 A.D. I mean, it had always been that God wanted heart worship, that’s why Amos said, “Stop your songs, your hearts aren’t right. I hate your feasts. I hate your Sabbaths. I hate what you’re doing.” Malachi said the same thing, “All you ever bring Me is lame animals.” Isaiah 1 said the same thing: your whole head is sick from top to bottom. It’s always been about the heart, but all those symbols that once pointed them in the direction of heart worship are gone, are gone.’
Back to Jesus’ taking the Gospel outside of the Jews (near the bottom of the page):
‘You say, “Well, how do you know she was really converted?” I think the conversation continued. By the way, it’s just not recorded. But how do I know she was converted? Go down to verse 39, “From that city many of the Samaritans believed in Him because of the word of the woman who testified.” There were many of the people who believed in Him because of her testimony. “He told me all the things that I had done.” He has to be from God. And as she believed, they believed. When the Samaritans came to Jesus they asked Him to stay with them and He stayed there two days–two days of seminary, two days of theology, two days of unveiling divine revelation so they could fully understand the gospel. As a result, many more believed because of His word. And they were saying to the woman, it’s no longer because of you that we believe, but we have heard for ourselves and know that this is the one who is the Savior of the world. The key word “world,” that salvation had come not just to Israel, but to outcasts.’
Therefore, what I take from that story is that He took His ministry outside of His people.
Re the third temple, it will be interesting to see how or if that project progresses.
LikeLiked by 1 person
April 4, 2017 at 4:38 pm
cookingflip
Thanks for sharing, churchmouse. I bookmarked the link/page. I actually miss JMcA’s messages as I don’t get Premier radio’s signal any more. Anyway, ‘can always download. God bless.
LikeLike
April 4, 2017 at 4:51 pm
churchmouse
You can see all of MacArthur’s works (other than books) at gty.org.
LikeLike
April 5, 2017 at 8:35 am
cookingflip
Thanks, churchmouse.
LikeLiked by 1 person