On September 5, I posted ‘Today’s Democrats aren’t those your grandparents admired’.
One of my readers, H E, has given me permission to repost his comment, which is worthy of its own entry:
Very good writeup about the current ideology and tactics of the Democrat party. The Democrat party has been taken over completely by Marxist radicals, now calling themselves “Progressives” . The party is a monolith, there are no “Conservative Democrats” or “Centrist Democrats” represented in it. As you said, the current Democrat Party is not the party of Franklin Roosevelt and John Kennedy.
As a 62 year old American, I can look back and see that many of the actions of the today’s “Progressives” are not new, they go back 50 years to the late 1960s. At that time, radical groups such as the Students for a Democratic Society and the Black Panthers murdered policemen and blew up government buildings. But back then, there were countervailing forces in society that pushed back against the radicals and stopped them. In response, the radicals changed tactics. They infiltrated society in order to gain control of the levers of power and to neutralize any entities that might oppose them. Today we can see that they have mostly succeeded in this regard: the administrative and judicial branches of government are dominated by radicals, and the mass media, academia, mainstream religious organizations, and labor unions now serve the Progressive agenda.
In response to the Trump presidency, Progressives have dropped their façade and come into the open about their policies and goals.
One can no longer deny the following facts about American society:
-There is an entity which can be referred to as the Deep State comprised of unelected government officials, businessmen, and military officials who secretly manipulate and direct national policy in accords with the Progressive agenda.
-The Democrat Party is the political arm of the Deep State.
-There is little effective difference in the agendas of the establishment Democrat and Republican parties. Both parties serve the interests of the Deep State.
-The mass media is the propaganda arm of the Deep State. Its purpose is to broadcast the Deep State’s narrative of events and to shut down public discussions that go against the narrative.
-Academia and the education bureaucracy indoctrinate the youth into the values of the Deep State.
I could not agree more.
I am close to H E’s age and clearly remember the notional Progressives’ antics from 50 years ago. Who could have imagined that they would be at the forefront of American politics today with even more madness?
The one element I would add to this list is the infiltration of the Church by these people. That started over a century ago in the US with Walter Rauschenbusch’s social gospel and continued in the 20th century with the Communist Party’s ‘honeyed words to the church people’.
Decades earlier, in 1840, an Italian Jesuit coined the term ‘social justice’. In the 20th century and today, using Antonio Gramsci’s passive revolution tactics, a number of theologians and professors, such as the late Joseph Buttigieg — Democrat candidate Pete Buttigieg’s father — pushed for ‘social justice’ and ‘change’ in the Catholic Church.
There were secret agents in the clergy, too, in the decades preceding Vatican II.
Today, many Democrats — Catholic and Protestant — are working to help illegals via church agencies. Even the Salvation Army is at it, intimidating an Epoch Times reporter who was at the border earlier this year.
The Democrats are bad news.
5 comments
September 11, 2019 at 10:52 am
Mark C
I take issue with the statement “The party is a monolith, there are no “Conservative Democrats” or “Centrist Democrats” represented in it”, since a centrist “Blue Dog Coalition” with the party still exist, as do Democrats with conservative values such as Joe Manchin.
Both the Democratic and the Grand Old parties consist of several factions, and they all have a mishmash of stances picked from older ideologies, so we cannot label people as completely conservative or liberal anymore. For example, Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez adopts liberal values such as “social justice”, equality, and separation between religion and government, but she calls for governmental regulation of the private sector, which is essentially the conservative mode of governance.
LikeLike
September 11, 2019 at 10:55 am
churchmouse
There are few traditional Democrats these days.
I would seriously question that government regulation of the private sector is a ‘conservative mode of governance’. True conservatives are about free markets. Republicans have become increasingly Big Government in their policies over the decades.
LikeLike
September 11, 2019 at 12:53 pm
Mark C
“I would seriously question that government regulation of the private sector is a ‘conservative mode of governance’. True conservatives are about free markets. Republicans have become increasingly Big Government in their policies over the decades”.
That’s because I define conservatism and liberalism as people defined them in around the 18th century, when conservative members of the French Estates-General sat on the right side of the assembly, while their liberal counterparts sat on the left side. Conservatism at that time was a reference to the things that traditionalists wanted to conserve: namely, the monarchy, the regulation of the private sector by the government, hierarchy, close alliance between religion and government, and tradition. Liberalism then stood for republicanism or democracy, limitations on the government, free enterprise, equality, social justice, and separation between religion and government.
The shift in definition began with the leftward statists of the French Revolution, which Thomas Jefferson and I happen to support, when the Jacobin group used the conservative mode of governance (regulation of the private sector by the government) to bring about liberal goals such as equality, fairness, and social justice.
Over time, the definitions of conservatism and liberalism at least in the United States changed so that those with liberal values and principles support the conservative mode of governance to bring about liberal goals, while those conservative values look to the liberal mode of governance to protect conservative interests.
LikeLike
September 12, 2019 at 7:36 am
churchmouse
Government regulation of the private sector is a new one for me in terms of conservatism.
That might be the French perspective, but it has not been an American one.
Here’s a Thomas Jefferson quote: ‘The care of human life and happiness, and not their destruction, is the first and only object of good government.’
Here’s one from Ronald Reagan: ‘The most terrifying words in the English language are: “I’m from the government and I’m here to help”.’
https://www.brainyquote.com/quotes/ronald_reagan_128358
https://www.brainyquote.com/quotes/thomas_jefferson_135370
As US president, Thomas Jefferson said:
‘[A] wise and frugal Government, which shall restrain men from injuring one another, shall leave them otherwise free to regulate their own pursuits of industry and improvement, and shall not take from the mouth of labor the bread it has earned.’
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Small_government#United_States
LikeLike
September 12, 2019 at 10:37 am
Mark C
Conservatism and liberalism originated in Europe, so I am basically using their “original” definitions.
LikeLike