You are currently browsing the daily archive for January 20, 2022.
Daily Archive
A quick look at the Palace of Westminster, home to Parliament
January 20, 2022 in Anglican, Catholic, history, Protestant | Tags: Anglican, architecture, Augustus Pugin, Big Ben, bishop, Catholic, Charles Barry, Elizabeth Tower, England, history, Palace of Westminster, Parliament, Protestant, Sir Lindsay Hoyle, UK | Comments closed
A few days ago, I happened across some interesting illustrations of the parliamentary estate in London, old and new.
The first tweet shows the complex as it was in the mid-1500s. The text about Bishop Thirlby pertains to his membership of the House of Lords as a Lord Spiritual, a bishop in the Church of England:
16 Jan 1541: Thomas Thirlby the first & only Bishop of #Westminster takes his seat in the House of Lords #otd (BM) This Church of #England diocese was abolished in 1550, existing for only one decade. Thirlby, a survivor, was moved to #Norwich. pic.twitter.com/TdsXJ8fPWj
— John McCafferty (@jdmccafferty) January 16, 2022
The Lords Spiritual still exist today, with the Right Revd David Urquhart as their convenor:
On duty in the House of Lords this week and reading prayers at the start of each sitting day is the Bishop of Birmingham, @David_Urq . Bishop David is also Convenor of the Lords Spiritual. pic.twitter.com/YD7O1GY6h4
— Church of England in Parliament (@churchstate) January 17, 2022
Returning to the illustration of the parliamentary estate, here is another illustration from the same period. This is what the House of Lords looked like in the Elizabethan era:
#OTD 1559, Elizabeth I was crowned Queen of England. The #Tudor monarch would rule for 45 years. 👑
But what did the Elizabethan House of Lords looks like? This is the question Dr Paul Hunneyball from our Lords 1558-1603 project asked in this blog:https://t.co/vYSTSPTY4u
— HistoryofParliament (@HistParl) January 15, 2022
The above illustrations show what Parliament looked like when the Gunpowder Plot of 1605 took place (image credit: Wikipedia).
A small group of English Catholics attempted to blow up the House of Lords on November 5 that year. The objective was to remove James I, a Protestant, from the throne and re-install a Catholic monarchy. Robert Catesby led the group of men, although the perpetrator we remember best is Guy (Guido) Fawkes, for whom the evening of November 5 — our fireworks/bonfire night — is named. Fawkes was in charge of the explosives. Traditionally, a ‘guy’, an effigy, was made. People contributed loose change to calls for ‘a penny for the guy’ to pay for the effigy and associated fireworks. The effigy was then burnt and fireworks let off as a way of saying that traitors will not prevail against our government.
Half a century later, we have an example of what written legislation looked like. Note the French language at the top, a legacy of the Norman invasion of 1066. ‘Le Roy le veult’ is archaic French for ‘The King wills it’. The feminine version, for Elizabeth I, was ‘La Reyne le veult’. The text of the law is written in English:
Kudos to everyone out there giving #DryJanuary a bash. You’re nearly at the halfway point so no turning back now…To help the process here’s a 1606 Act that is for ‘repressing the odious and loathsome Sin of Drunkenness’. Straight to the point no faking… #TowerActs @dryjanuary pic.twitter.com/CZpqZzlLRa
— Parliament Archives (@UKParlArchives) January 13, 2022
It was not unusual for accidental fires to break out in or near the estate.
A bad one occurred in 1779 (pictured in the next tweet), but the one that ravaged nearly everything, except for Westminster Hall and a few lesser structures, occurred in 1834:
There had been warnings… the Parliament Coffee House had been on fire twice before…#HistParl #Westminster
— The Georgian Lords (@GeorgianLords) January 13, 2022
On October 16, 1834, an overheated wood-burning stove caught fire. In 1835, King William IV assured Parliamentarians that the blaze had been accidental.
A fierce competition to rebuild Parliament took place among leading British architects divided into one of two camps: neoclassical or neo-Gothic.
In the end, Charles Barry’s neo-Gothic design won. A young architect, Augustus Pugin, had to submit his design under Barry’s name. This was because Pugin had recently converted to Catholicism and his earlier designs for other buildings in England were rejected for that reason.
While the argument over architectural style raged on, Barry supervised construction of the new Palace of Westminster until his death in 1860. By then, Barry had received a knighthood for the building of both houses of Parliament, the Commons and the Lords.
This is a painting of the new structure in 1864:
Today's #OnlineArtExchange from @artukdotorg is all about the colour orange.
So we're taking a brief pause from our London Underground posts to share this:
'The Houses of Parliament from the River' || 1864 || James Francis Danbyhttps://t.co/O7spjycijq pic.twitter.com/KLytIdSgEp
— Paintings of London (@PaintingsLondon) January 13, 2022
As for the clock tower, the Elizabeth Tower that houses Big Ben, Pugin designed that, too, although Barry, his superior, added a few finishing touches and submitted the plans under his own name.
“I never worked so hard in my life [as] for Mr Barry for tomorrow I render all the designs for finishing his bell tower & it is beautiful & I am the whole machinery of the clock.”[38]
Pugin is largely responsible for the lavish, church-like interior. In his other work, Pugin designed churches and other religious buildings. In 2012, the BBC broadcast a documentary about him called God’s Own Architect.
Pugin predeceased his boss, Charles Barry. In February 1852, he suffered a nervous breakdown whilst on a train to London with his son Edward. When the train arrived in the capital, Pugin was incoherent and unable to recognise anyone. He was in two different asylums until September that year, when his wife Jane was able to take him to the home he had designed for them, The Grange, in Ramsgate, Kent. Pugin died on September 14. He is buried next door at a church he designed, St Augustine’s, a Catholic Church.
The design of the current Palace of Westminster is still contentious today:
JUST IN: MPs will be warned of a specific Chinese spying threat targeted at them TODAY.https://t.co/J1Lu9ZEV7n
— Harry Cole (@MrHarryCole) January 13, 2022
The architectural debate continues. People love the neo-Gothic style or loathe it. I find it beautiful:
It really is a horrible building. Not fit for purpose either.
— Sarah Bowerman (@Bowermanland) January 13, 2022
Today, the Palace of Westminster is undergoing much-needed renovation. The scaffolding continues to be removed from the Elizabeth Tower, and soon Big Ben will be ringing again.
It has taken ten years to replace the Victorian cast iron roof, the largest in Europe, if not the world. The two Speakers of the House — Lord McFall of Alcluith (Lords) and Sir Lindsay Hoyle (Commons) — admire the finished product. Click on the photos to see them fully. Sir Lindsay Hoyle is in the red jacket:
Tens of 000s of individual components were removed for the 1st time since they were installed under the supervision of Charles Barry in the mid 19th century. If laid end-to-end, the scaffolding used during the restoration project would stretch from London to John O’Groats.
— James Heale (@JAHeale) January 18, 2022
The Palace of Westminster is a magnificent structure.
It is thought that the Elizabeth Tower will reopen for tours sometime this year.
A thing of beauty is a joy forever.