You are currently browsing churchmouse’s articles.

Hannah GrantTeam Tinkoff-Saxo is fortunate to have Hannah Grant as their chef.

(Photo credit: Tinkoff-Saxo)

She ensures that the team’s riders have tasty and nutritionally balanced meals each day.

Of course, Hannah cooks for Tinkoff-Saxo in all races, not just the Tour de France.

However, it is the Tour which attracts the most attention.

And Hannah’s cookbook is entitled The Grand Tour Cookbook, available to order from her website.

Cycling’s food secrets

The Telegraph recently summarised Hannah’s cooking strategies for Tinkoff-Saxo. These are useful for mothers of budding athletes and anyone else who cooks for a family. Excerpts follow, emphases mine.

Avoid monotony:

The general thought is that food for professional cyclists is mostly just pasta and chicken. We don’t work with those old-school principles. What actually goes into feeding a troop of riders through a Tour de France or another Grand Tour is very different. The food should be inspiring and tasty. A real crowd-pleaser for the team is salmon with orange and ginger.

Eat together:

Meals are the only times of the day when all the riders can sit down together and just talk and relax.

Try new concepts:

I sometimes like to do dishes that are inspired by where the different riders are from. It gets them talking about flavours and tastes. No matter what your nationality or personality, everybody can relate to food somehow.

Make sure ingredients are identifiable:

If a meal is made of too many ingredients or things they don’t recognise then they might not want to eat it. So we work on the principle that every vegetable and ingredient is as visible as possible.

Cook from scratch:

We cook everything from scratch and we don’t use any ready-made products.

Treat your diners now and then:

On the night before a rest day I serve a build-your-own burger, which is a treat but it also indicates that it is a rest day so it is a psychological thing. It says: ‘There is a rest day coming up and you can relax a bit.’

Hannah Grant the chef

Hannah gave Velo News an extensive interview in 2013.

She is Danish and has a husband.

Initially, Hannah’s dream was to become a Michelin starred chef. She completed the requisite four years of training in Denmark. She worked at the world renowned Noma in Copenhagen.

She then considered a degree in food science from the University of Copenhagen. This would have necessitated a part-time job. Her sous chef suggested ringing a contact of his at Tinkoff-Saxo. The rest is history:

I thought it sounded intriguing. I have a basic education in health and nutrition, so I had the basics down for that, and he said, “This could be really interesting for you.”

And I spoke to the guys here at the team — they had lined up three other guys up for the job, but they wanted to try something new and so they hired a female chef. And basically that was it. That was the weird road that led me here. And so I got hired and got thrown straight into a training camp, 30 riders, alone, the hardest 14 days of my life, but I earned my spot here.

Although she knew little about cycling at the time, Hannah’s now an avid fan, which is just as well!

She has a huge responsibility every day the team is on tour. Balancing nutritional needs, sourcing food in remote areas and avoiding digestive issues are constant preoccupations:

… we have a philosophy of using lots of vegetables, proteins, and cold-pressed fats, and then we use a lot of gluten-free alternatives. So we try to encourage the riders to try other things than just pasta and bread. I do gluten-free breads as well.

It’s all to minimize all the little things that can stop you from performing 100 percent, that promote injuries, stomach problems, all those things. So that’s a big difference (from cooking in a restaurant), because I have to follow all those rules. I can’t just cook whatever I think is amazing. It has to be within those guidelines.

if I have even the slightest doubt that something’s good, I throw it out. I never serve shellfish for the same reason, never any mussels or anything. Never anything that could have even a one in 1,000 chance of not being good. Even if it smells fresh, I never serve it. That’s a priority. I take no chances.

As for odd locations on the Tour de France, Hannah says:

… now I’m in the routine and I know how to do it, so it’s easier. I source from wherever I can. Sometimes I order through the hotels, sometimes there’s a market, sometimes I go to (the supermarket). In France, it’s great, they have lots of biodynamic things in the market. We go very much organic and biodynamic whenever we can.

So it’s basically whatever is available, but because we have the big truck and the big fridges, I can fill up for four or five days in a row. So I know now that when we’re going to the Alps, I can’t get anything on Alpe d’Huez, so it’s important for me to load up and be ready for that.

Hannah acknowledges that being away from home for weeks at a time is difficult, however, she minimises distractions:

It’s not so bad. The first year was hard, because I didn’t know how to source my energies out. Now I know, I keep my conversations short with my husband (so I can stay focused on my work). This is also a learning process in a relationship. But for sure, I love being out, and it’s nice coming home. But it’s a lot about getting used to being out here.

Tinkoff-Saxo may not be the only professional cycling team with a chef, however, Hannah Grant is the first to lift the lid on what goes on in a Tour de France kitchen.

Much to France’s chagrin, the Tour de France has not had a French winner since Bernard Hinault in 1985.

This produced much negative media coverage concerning Britain’s dominant Team Sky and the winner, their leader, Chris Froome.

This is Froome’s second Tour victory. The first was in 2013. The British have now won the Tour de France three times since 2012, when Sir Bradley Wiggins became the first winner from the UK.

Target Froome

The French suspect Froome of doping. Yet, he won this year’s Tour by only 1’12” over Colombia’s Nairo Quintana (Movistar), who made no secret of his own desire to take first place on the podium in Paris.

Oliver Brown, writing for The Telegraph, explained:

Froome has found this race antithetical to any notion of comradeship. He has borne the brunt of outrageous attacks from spectators, endured the slurs arising from critical documentaries on French television, and waged public and unpleasant battles with his chief rivals – not least Vincenzo Nibali, who he accused of unsportsmanlike conduct for trying to exploit his mechanical failure on the descent from the Col du Croix. For 21 days, he has been a man besieged …

A climate of scepticism is perfectly legitimate in light of cycling’s benighted recent heritage, captured by a bizarre appearance mid-tour by the attention-seeking Lance Armstrong. But for Froome to be belittled and excoriated without a shred of hard medical expertise has the feel of a sordid injustice. He would be within his rights if he refused to celebrate too conspicuously on Sunday. He ought to derive greatest pride, though, from having emerged unscathed from one of the most gruelling emotional ordeals that an athlete should ever have to endure.

Froome’s Tour gave viewers a lesson in patience and doggedness. He was calm, quiet and determined on every stage. He refused to get unnerved by attacks from Quintana, Alejandro Valverde or Alberto Contador. His Sky teammates stayed cool, too, and were there for him every day. The climbs proved tough for some and, occasionally, Froome was on his own near the end, but he rode with aplomb, dedication and humility throughout.

In his victory speech, Froome alluded to the accusations he received this year. From The Sun:

In a victory speech laced with emotion, he said of the Yellow Jersey: “It is very special. I understand its history, good and bad, and I will always respect it, never dishonour it and I’ll always be proud to have won it.”

Team Sky ace Froome has been the victim of a vile campaign of doping slurs as well as physical and verbal abuse from sick fans.

But after swapping the urine and spit for champagne, he added: “Someone needs to speak up for the cyclists of 2015 and I’m happy to do that.

“Someone’s got to take a stand, it’s time.”

Froome won not only the Tour but the polka dot ‘king of the mountains’ jersey which puts him on a par with the legendary Belgian Tour winner Eddy Merckx who won both in 1970.

Yet, even some Britons disparage the UK’s latest sporting hero. The comments following one Telegraph article reveal that Froome isn’t British enough. Not only was he born and raised in Africa, he now lives in Monaco. As a British citizen, how dare he?

Soon, Froome will become a father for the first time. I wish him and his wife Michelle all the very best.

The African Tour

Chris Froome was born in Nairobi, Kenya, and spent his formative years in South Africa. It was in Africa that he developed his love of cycling. His English parents emigrated from Gloucestershire to become arable farmers in Kenya. He was reading economics at the University of South Africa when, two years into his degree, he left to join the South African cycling team of Konica Minolta.

However, he was not the only reason the 2015 Tour was an African one.

A new wildcard African team entered this year’s Tour: MTN-Qhubeka. Whilst the Tour has had African teams and riders before now, the Tour de France site tells us:

Rooted in South Africa since its creation in 1997 by Douglas Ryder, a professional cyclist until 2002 and still the manager of a team sponsored since 2007 by the telecoms operator present throughout the African continent, Qhubeka (a word that means “advance” in the Xhosa language) is a foundation that provides bicycles as a means of transport to underprivileged populations. It is a team with a strong identity and humanitarian calling that is set to write a fine page in the grand international history of the Tour de France. In its ranks, it boasts Eritrean Daniel Teklehaimanot, the best climber on this year’s Critérium du Dauphiné, and his countryman Merhawi Kudus, who completed the Vuelta at the age of 20 years. The toughest runners on the planet come from this part of the world. Now it is cycling’s turn to be enhanced by these exceptional athletes.

And it wasn’t long before MTN-Qhubeka became a household word. On Stage 6, the aforementioned Daniel Teklehaimanot became the first black African to wear the Polka Dot jersey. All eyes were on him and his teammates thereafter.

Teklehaimanot’s teammate, Steve Cummings, fittingly won Stage 14 on July 18 — Nelson Mandela Day.

Cummings was born and raised in Merseyside and was also on Team Sky before joining MTN-Qhubeka for the 2015 season.

We look forward to seeing more of MTN-Qhubeka next year, especially Teklehaimanot, a brilliant climber and marvellous to watch!

Hope for France

Spain’s Movistar won the team prize this year.

In 2014, it was France’s AG2R-La Mondiale. My hopes were high because their indefatiguable Jean-Christophe Peraud came in second place and Romain Bardet sixth.

This year, Bardet came in ninth place and Pierre Rolland (Europcar) came in tenth.

At least Bardet won the Super-Combative — Most Aggressive — rider prize. And he won Stage 18, his first Tour stage victory, a daunting Alpine challenge from Gap to Saint-Jean-de-Maurienne:

He built it from a long lasting breakaway and escaped near the top of col du Glandon and rode away solo in the downhill. He stayed away for 40 kilometres with an advantage of 40 seconds over his chasers. This is the second stage win for France and AG2R-La Mondiale at this year’s Tour de France.

It was amazing to watch and one can only admire a young man who told interviewers he bought several books before the Tour de France just so he could distract himself from cycling during his limited free time.

Things looked much brighter for France last year. It will be an uphill struggle — no pun intended.

France Télévisions and ITV4 do it again

France Télévisions did a superb job of filming and broadcasting the Tour de France. Anyone who wouldn’t want to visit France after seeing the beautiful countryside and monuments is, frankly, a bit off.

No other network can film cycling the way France2 and France 3 can. Nothing ever looked flat or one-dimensional as cycling races can in other countries. There must be something in the way French cameramen are trained. Everything is cinematic, eminently watchable.

Tour fans in the UK are grateful that ITV4 have the broadcast rights to free-to-view live coverage of every stage. It appears this will continue to 2019, thankfully.

July was indeed a beautiful month, enhanced by ITV4’s broadcasts, including commentary from Tour veterans Jens Voigt and David Millar!

Last week, several news articles hit the headlines concerning allergic reactions to plants.

Each case required a visit to the casualty unit or a stay in hospital.

Being a keen gardener myself, I was stunned to read these accounts of notionally harmless plants.

(Photo: F Geller-Grimm/Wikimedia Commons)The first story involves teenage boys who were playing in a park in Bolton, Greater Manchester. They brushed up against hogweed and, naturally, thought little of it. A rash later developed, which then turned into blisters and boils. The Mirror has photographs. Two of the boys required hospital treatment. One needed to stay overnight. Both are still receiving drugs to help their recovery. Initially, physicians at Royal Bolton Hospital were baffled by the injuries. However (emphases mine):

It can take as long as seven years for the skin to repair itself after a hogweed burn and the boys will now have to make sure they are protected from sunlight.

If the hogweed sap is rubbed into the eyes, it can cause temporary or even permanent blindness.

Apparently, according to the Woodland Trust — from which the photo also comesit is the giant hogweed which can be hazardous. Woodland Trust tells us:

Giant hogweed (Heracleum mantegazzianum) is a plant in the Apiaceae family which was introduced to the UK as an ornamental garden plant. It has white flowers and deeply incised compound leaves (where the leaf is divided into several smaller leaflets) whose edges are irregular and very sharply or jaggedly cut. It looks similar to its harmless relative common hogweed however it can grow up to 5.5 metres (18 feet) in height, making it easy to spot when fully grown!

Giant hogweed is closely related to carrots, common hogweed, cow parsley, and (a bit confusingly!) is sometimes known as cow parsnip, or wild rhubarb.

The second story involves Mrs Rita Savage, 79, of Frome, Somerset. Several years ago, her sister gave her a Madagascar palm — a type of cactus — which Mrs Savage replanted recently after it outgrew its pot. Whilst repotting it, she accidentally pierced herself with one of the thorns. Emergency services were initially unhelpful because they did not understand the significance of her swelling and pain. She spent several days in hospital taking antibiotics and antihistamines. Doctors told her that she would recover fully — in another six weeks!

The third incident occurred in Loup near the Côte d’Azur. Six-year old Louise, from nearby Vence, was on a picnic with her parents. She and a young friend were having fun pulling leaves off a fig tree. Twenty-four hours later, both girls had to be rushed to hospital with burns and huge blisters. One of Louise’s hands has second degree burns. (Nice-Matin has photos.)  Louise’s mother told Nice-Matin:

[Doctors] told me it’s an ongoing phenomenon. However, I didn’t even know such a thing existed. No one talks about it.

In a conversation about gardening here last week, my reader Underground Pewster helpfully explained:

The milky sap that one finds when picking figs is both a local irritant and allergen. In addition, some people can develop burns when the sap affected skin is exposed to ultraviolet light. I have experienced only mild skin irritation on the fingers which is worse with the less ripe fig. When the stem or skin is green, then more sap will be flowing. Peeling figs can cause the same problem when the skin is thick and not fully ripe.

Who knew such hazards existed? The Tandurust site has more detail on fig tree sap. Excerpts follow:

Fig allergy rash may come from contact with the latex of unripe fig fruits which is usually made into a powder to be used for making meat tender, clarifying beverages, and rendering fat.

Rash will appear as a result of irritation which has been a big problem for fig harvesters.

… the leaf and root sap of a fig tree cause more allergic reaction and rashes than the unripe fruit and other parts of the tree

Psoralen and bergapten which are abundant in leaf and root saps of fig trees are considered to be the primary cause of the allergic reactions and the appearance of rashes.

Besides rashes, phytophotodermatitis can also develop when a patient comes into contact with psoralen that is present in fig trees. This condition is characterized by hyperpigmentation, sunburns, and blisters. There also had been cases of anaphylaxis.

I would not wish to cause my readers alarm, but it is worthwhile reading up on certain plants before working or playing with them.

I’ll certainly pay closer attention in future!

Bible treehuggercomThe three-year Lectionary that many Catholics and Protestants hear in public worship gives us a great variety of Holy Scripture.

Yet, it doesn’t tell the whole story.

My series Forbidden Bible Verses — ones the Lectionary editors and their clergy omit — examines the passages we do not hear in church. These missing verses are also Essential Bible Verses, ones we should study with care and attention. Often, we find that they carry difficult messages and warnings.

Today’s reading is from the English Standard Version with commentary by Matthew Henry and John MacArthur.

Matthew 8:5-13

The Faith of a Centurion

5 When he had entered Capernaum, a centurion came forward to him, appealing to him, “Lord, my servant is lying paralyzed at home, suffering terribly.” And he said to him, “I will come and heal him.” But the centurion replied, “Lord, I am not worthy to have you come under my roof, but only say the word, and my servant will be healed. For I too am a man under authority, with soldiers under me. And I say to one, ‘Go,’ and he goes, and to another, ‘Come,’ and he comes, and to my servant,[a] ‘Do this,’ and he does it.” 10 When Jesus heard this, he marveled and said to those who followed him, “Truly, I tell you, with no one in Israel[b] have I found such faith. 11 I tell you, many will come from east and west and recline at table with Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob in the kingdom of heaven, 12 while the sons of the kingdom will be thrown into the outer darkness. In that place there will be weeping and gnashing of teeth.” 13 And to the centurion Jesus said, “Go; let it be done for you as you have believed.” And the servant was healed at that very moment.

———————————————————————

A parallel account of this miracle is in Luke 7:1-10. I have highlighted the differences in bold:

Jesus Heals a Centurion’s Servant

After he had finished all his sayings in the hearing of the people, he entered Capernaum. Now a centurion had a servant[a] who was sick and at the point of death, who was highly valued by him. When the centurion[b] heard about Jesus, he sent to him elders of the Jews, asking him to come and heal his servant. And when they came to Jesus, they pleaded with him earnestly, saying, “He is worthy to have you do this for him, for he loves our nation, and he is the one who built us our synagogue.” And Jesus went with them. When he was not far from the house, the centurion sent friends, saying to him, “Lord, do not trouble yourself, for I am not worthy to have you come under my roof. Therefore I did not presume to come to you. But say the word, and let my servant be healed. For I too am a man set under authority, with soldiers under me: and I say to one, ‘Go,’ and he goes; and to another, ‘Come,’ and he comes; and to my servant, ‘Do this,’ and he does it.” When Jesus heard these things, he marveled at him, and turning to the crowd that followed him, said, “I tell you, not even in Israel have I found such faith.” 10 And when those who had been sent returned to the house, they found the servant well.

Whether the centurion sought our Lord in person or sent local Jewish elders is less important than the fact that this Gentile — pagan — had not only a deep humility but true faith that Jesus was fully capable of healing the sick from a distance.

To better appreciate this miracle and the centurion’s mindset, it is useful to try and place oneself in that era. A supplicant centurion, even via emissaries, was surprising as was Jesus’s agreement to heal the servant. Matthew’s passage also includes our Lord’s prediction about the Jewish people and Gentiles.

Looking at verse 5, the backdrop is Capernaum, which Jesus had just entered. It is likely that this, as well as the cleansing of the leper, occurred shortly after He had concluded the Sermon on the Mount nearby.

A centurion approached Jesus. This was every bit as astonishing as the leper who, a short while beforehand, told Jesus that He could cleanse him if He saw it appropriate. That appeal was an exercise in humility.

Just as the leper was an outcast, so was the centurion. The centurion, a Roman military officer, would have commanded 80 to 200 men. Rome stationed centurions throughout the empire’s territories. Their presence was a constant reminder of domination.

John MacArthur says that Israel’s centurions were local men — Gentiles — therefore, pagans (emphases mine):

The soldiers of the Roman occupation army were not really sent from Rome.  They were trained in the community or the area where they were being occupied. And what they did, according to history, what they did in Palestine was they found non-Jewish people in that area and they drew them into the Roman army and trained themThis man in Capernaum was, no doubt, a soldier under the troops of Antipas. And if he was a non-Jew living in this area, it is highly likely that he was a Samaritan. And if it was bad to be a Gentile, the worst kind of Gentile was a Samaritan, because a Samaritan was a Jew who had intermarried into Gentile lines, and that was to sacrifice his Jewish heritage, the worst imaginable kind of Gentile half-breed.

So here you’ve got a guy who’s a Gentile.  He’s the worst kind of Gentile, a Samaritan.  He’s the worst kind of Samaritan.  He is a member of the occupation forces of the Roman army who are oppressing Israel.

Yet, this man, as Luke tells us, built a synagogue for his local congregation. MacArthur says the ruins of the temple still exist, even if Capernaum as a town no longer does:

He loved their nation, and he built them a synagogue in Capernaum.  I’ve been in Capernaum.  I’ve stood in the ruins of the synagogue there.  They say the footings of the synagogue came from this day, and maybe they were purchased by this very centurion.

Now back to Matthew’s account. In verse 6, the centurion appealed to our Lord, telling Him that his servant is at home ‘suffering terribly’ from paralysis.

The ESV defines ‘servant’ here as ‘bondservant’, someone who owed a debt to the master which was to be paid off through slavery. MacArthur says that the servant could have been a child:

“Lord, my, [He used the word pais in the Greek, which means my child] my child lies at home sick of the paralutikos.”  He’s a paralytic, sick of the paralysis, grievously tormented, or suffering tremendously or suffering severely.  Now, the word pais is used here, and it means child.  Luke uses the word doulos, which means bond slave. And the question comes up: Was he his child or his bond slave?  The answer is it was rather common to have a child slave in the house, a young boy. And that’s what it was, a boy servant, a boy slave. And so he says, “My boy slave is at home sick of the paralysis.”  We don’t know whether it was polio or whether it was a nervous system or brain disorder or a tumor.  We just don’t know; but he was paralyzed and in tremendous pain.

Jesus immediatly responded that He would go to the servant and heal him (verse 7). This was unthinkable in view of the Jews’ impressions of Gentiles, the lowest of the low who would never inherit the kingdom of God. Jesus would have been in the midst of a crowd, so onlookers must have been shocked or confused. MacArthur explains:

They believed that, before the kingdom came, all the Gentiles would be destroyed.  That’s right.  If you read the, some of the apocryphal literature like 2 Baruch, chapter 29, it pictures the, what they believe is going to be the great feast, where all the Jews will sit down with Messiah … The great messianic banquet; and never, for a moment, did they believe that Gentiles would be reclining at the table with them.

Furthermore:

They wouldn’t … use—a Gentile utensil.  They, they believed that Gentiles aborted their babies and threw them down the draft in the house.  Therefore, the house was polluted by a dead body, and they had all kinds of strange things that the rabbis had invented to keep them apart from the Gentiles.

For this reason, and also out of profound personal humility, the centurion declined Jesus’s gracious offer (verse 7).

Instead, he said that Jesus needed only say the word in order for the servant to be healed (verse 8).

The centurion was in awe of Jesus. He discusses his own situation — commanding soldiers — and, in this (verse 9), is saying that he recognised His authority. The unspoken subtext is that Jesus’s power and authority are infinitely greater than his own. Hence, the humility of his appeal. He dared not to invite Jesus to his home. He did not feel worthy.

Jesus immediately contrasted this Gentile’s faith and recognition with what He had found among His own people whom He came to save (verse 10).

He then issued a strong warning that many, unknown to the Jews, would inherit the kingdom of heaven (verse 11), whilst those expecting to be there would instead be cast into ‘outer darkness’ where there is ‘weeping and gnashing of teeth’ (verse 12).

And, as we read in John MacArthur’s analysis of the first several chapters of Matthew’s Gospel, Jesus left the Jews in order to teach and heal the Gentiles, establishing His Church among their number.

Returning to the centurion, Jesus instructed him to return home where he would find the servant healed — just as he believed (verse 13):

And the servant was healed at that very moment.

As Christians we can take several lessons from this, if not for ourselves, for others. Citations below are from Matthew Henry’s commentary.

1/ God owes us — miserable sinners that we are — no favours. May we therefore approach Him and His Son in humility and supplication for divine mercy and grace. The centurion, like the leper, recognised this. Note how they both approached Jesus. The leper: should You see fit to do so, You can heal me. The centurion: I am not worthy of Your presence in my house, but just say the word and my servant will be healed.

The centurion came to Christ with a petition, and therefore expressed himself thus humbly. Note, In all our approaches to Christ, and to God through Christ, it becomes us to abase ourselves, and to lie low in the sense of our own unworthiness, as mean creatures and as vile sinners, to do any thing for God, to receive any good from him, or to have any thing to do with him.

2/ Our Lord recognises our caring about others. The centurion’s servant was a slave who could have been put out of the house or neglected. There were many others who could have replaced him. Yet, the centurion was careful to seek Jesus’s help, even though the slave was on the bottom rung of society.

A charitable regard to his poor servant. We read of many that came to Christ for their children, but this is the only instance of one that came to him for a servant [he] sought out the best relief he could for him the servant could not have done more for the master, than the master did here for the servant.

We can extrapolate ‘servant’ for others who are equally deserving of our charity.

3/ This is also a spiritual analogy, relating to the state of the souls in our care.

We should thus concern ourselves for the souls of our children, and servants, that are spiritually sick of the palsy, the dead-palsy, the dumb palsy senseless of spiritual evils, inactive in that which is spiritually good, and bring them to the means of healing and health.

4/ May we never neglect the virtue of humility before Christ and our fellow man.

He does not say, “My servant is not worthy that thou shouldest come into his chamber, because it is in the garret ” But I am not worthy that thou shouldest come into my house. The centurion was a great man, yet he owned his unworthiness before God. Note, Humility very well becomes persons of quality. Christ now made but a mean figure in the world, yet the centurion, looking upon him as a prophet, yea, more than a prophet, paid him this respect. Note, We should have a value and veneration for what we see of God, even in those who, in outward condition, are every way our inferiors.

5/ Personal humility ties in with deep faith.

The more humility the more faith the more diffident we are of ourselves, the stronger will be our confidence in Jesus Christ.

6/ The centurion showed us that power of Christ knows no bounds.

This centurion believed, and it is undoubtedly true, that the power of Christ knows no limits, and therefore nearness and distance are alike to him. Distance of place cannot obstruct either the knowing or working of him that fills all places.

7/ Christ answers the call, whatever social status, of those with faith: leper or centurion.

Christ’s humility, in being willing to come, gave an example to him, and occasioned his humility, in owning himself unworthy to have him come. Note, Christ’s gracious condescensions to us, should make us the more humble and self-abasing before him.

8/ As was true with the Jews of Jesus’s time, not everyone who considers himself a member of the Church will be saved. We are in for some surprises:

Note, When we come to heaven, as we shall miss a great many there, that we thought had been going thither, so we shall meet a great many there, that we did not expect.

9/ Do we put our temporal comforts above our relationship with Christ? Are we in danger of putting ourselves in peril for eternity, a concept which is difficult for us to understand?

They shall be cast out from God, and all true comfort, and cast into darkness. In hell there is fire, but no light it is utter darkness[:] darkness in extremity the highest degree of darkness, without any remainder, or mixture, or hope, of light not the least gleam or glimpse of it it is darkness that results from their being shut out of heaven, the land of light they who are without, are in the regions of darkness yet that is not the worst of it, there shall be weeping and gnashing of teeth. 1. In hell there will be great grief, floods of tears shed to no purpose anguish of spirit preying eternally upon the vitals, in the sense of the wrath of God, is the torment of the damned. 2. Great indignation: damned sinners will gnash their teeth for spite and vexation, full of the fury of the Lord seeing with envy the happiness of others, and reflecting with horror upon the former possibility of their own being happy, which is now past.

With our busy schedules, let us ensure we make time to pray, even in the most unlikely places: the walk to a bus stop or railway station, when crossing the car park on the way to the office, whilst we are preparing dinner or doing household chores.

May we also develop the faith and humility of the centurion.

Next time: Matthew 8:14-17

hiding thebreakthroughorgOne of the most disappointing things believers encounter online are Christian sites that further conspiracy theories.

It is one thing to alert others about evil in this world which comes from corrupt and powerful people. It is quite another to continue to encourage those vulnerable in the faith to think that they should be living in fear because of it.

Certainly, there are places in the world — Africa and the Middle East — where Christians are suffering and dying for their Saviour.

We in the West, on the other hand, are keyboard warriors for real or extrapolated scary events and threatening people. If have fallen into this trap whilst professing to be Christians, aren’t we putting man above our Lord?

Encouraging other believers to be afraid is a denial of Christ. In fact, it is one of the Devil’s best works. By cloaking conspiracy theories as being biblical, those new to or shaky in Christianity see a bogeyman around every corner. They forget Christ’s power over sin and sinful man. Instead, they gravitate towards unbelief by feeding on conspiracy theories.

The Sola Sisters, two women who came to the faith in adulthood, explore falsehoods connected with Christianity. In 2015, they wrote extensively about and against conspiracy theories.

In one of these posts, ‘Christians and Conspiracy Theories: Witnessing, Romans 1 and An Appeal (Part 4)’ they say (emphases in the original, purple one mine):

What is the end-game for it? What lost people need is not a dissertation on evil. They need Christ. They need the gospel message. They need to be helped to understand what sin is, and then told that they need to repent and believe on Christ for the forgiveness of sins.

Let’s keep our eyes on the Christ, and make sure we’re keeping our hearts pure, and making sure our time is being spent on a BALANCED study of the Scriptures.

“All Scripture is God-breathed and is useful for teaching, rebuking, correcting and training in righteousness, so that the servant of God may be thoroughly equipped for every good work.” (2 Tim 3:16-17) 

“Finally, brethren, whatever is true, whatever is honorable, whatever is just, whatever is pure, whatever is lovely, whatever is commendable, if there is any excellence, if there is anything worthy of praise, think about these things.” (Phil 4:8)

“But in your hearts revere Christ as Lord. Always be prepared to give an answer to everyone who asks you to give the reason for the hope that you have. But do this with gentleness and respect.” (1 Peter 3:15)

“The path of the righteous is like the morning sun, shining ever brighter till the full light of day.” (Prov 4:18)

So let’s keep the main thing the main thing. Preach Jesus Christ and him crucified. And when souls are saved through the preaching of the gospel, those new believers WILL leave behind the trappings of the world of their own accord, because He who has begun good work in them will bring it to completion, will He not?

A few other Bible verses come to mind (emphases mine):

The Lord foils the plans of the nations; he thwarts the purposes of the peoples. (Psalms 33:10, NIV)

Do not call conspiracy everything that these people call conspiracy; do not fear what they fear, and do not dread it. (Isaiah 8:12, NIV)

And of whom have you been afraid, or feared, that you have lied and not remembered Me, nor taken it to your heart? Is it not because I have held My peace from of old that you do not fear Me? (Isaiah 57:11, NKJ)

But seek ye first the kingdom of God, and his righteousness … (Matthew 6:33, KJV)

Those of us alarming others about conspiracy theories would do well to realise that every moment we spend concentrating on them removes our focus from Christ Jesus.

We would do well to ask ourselves if we are doing the Lord’s work or Satan’s.

Like Le Bistrot Gourmand, Aux Bons Enfants, 80 Rue Meynadier, was another Cannes restaurant the Daily Telegraph recommended in 2015.

We added it to our list of places to eat in June 2015.

(Photo credit: Justacoté)

Potential diners should be aware that Aux Bons Enfants has a CASH ONLY policy.

The management does not accept credit cards, debit cards or cheques. Unfortunately, there is no mention of this at all at the restaurant’s entrance or on the menus.

In addition to the inconvenience, this type of policy raises suspicions with some French and Italian customers.

Right or wrong, it might result in lower prices. At €90 for two, wine included, it was our cheapest dinner.

Another factor in more reasonable prices is the fact that the family owns the premises.

Luc Giorsetti runs Aux Bons Enfants, which has been in business since 1935. His grandparents, Marie and Constant, made it a local landmark featuring regional specialities. In the late 1960s, Luc’s father Romain continued in his parents’ footsteps. He retired only a few years ago. Some families have been dining at Aux Bons Enfants for over three generations, each one passing the tradition down to the next.

Food is sourced locally, particularly from the nearby Marché Forville.

Reservations for dinner are strongly recommended. Whilst one cannot telephone Aux Bons Enfants, their website has a page allowing one to reserve by email. As the restaurant opens for lunch, it is also easy enough to stop by in the afternoon and book a table.

Another point to note is that the tables are spaced very closely together. This might be a good or a bad thing, depending on who is sitting next to you! The night we went — a Friday — two Cannes Lions sat next to us on the terrace. Our fragmented conversation did not change my negative impressions of two years ago. They were arrogant and elitist. My late grandmother-in-law, a born and bred Londoner, would have said: ‘They’re no better than they ought to be!’

Inside, Aux Bons Enfants is charming, although patrons will still be sitting cheek by jowl. Family pictures are everywhere, lending a pleasant, nostalgic atmosphere.

Service is adequate, at times perfunctory. Trip Advisor has a number of reviews from local French people and some Italians who objected to the manner of the wait staff.

That said, the food at Aux Bons Enfants is excellent. The prix fixe menu offers three courses with something for everyone.

SpouseMouse and I started with a succulent daube de poulpes comme à Marseille — octopus stew Marseille style. It comes in little cast iron Staub pots with lids. This is perfect for those who are curious about octopus. The stew, prepared with a red wine sauce, has equal proportions of octopus chunks and diced potatoes. The octopus is unctuous. It melts in the mouth. Interestingly, in that preparation it tastes like veal. Therefore, it is perfect for meat eaters looking for a seafood sensation!

For our main courses, SpouseMouse was very happy with the bavette de veau (veal) grillée. Bavette is comparable to a sirloin tip cut. The Giorsettis turned a less expensive cut of meat into a tender, memorable dish. The beignets d’aubergines which accompanied the bavette were generous pieces of deep-fried lightly-battered eggplant.

I had espadon grillé, which was the best swordfish I’d ever tasted. It had just enough texture but, unlike swordfish I’ve had elsewhere, was neither dense nor heavy. I could have eaten in quite happily the next day! The tomates à la provençale I’d ordered as a side dish complemented the fish perfectly.

SpouseMouse had a respectable tarte au citron for dessert, though not as good as Le Bistrot Gourmand‘s. I enjoyed a satisfying cheese assortment which came with a lightly dressed salad.

Our rosé was Domaine de Jale ‘Les Fenouils’ (‘The Fennels’), which was delightful.

We will be returning to Aux Bons Enfants on our next trip and look forward to sampling more from one of Cannes’ most traditional menus. However, we shall book a table for a Tuesday or Wednesday, when we hope it will be less busy.

One of our new gastronomic discoveries in Cannes this year was Le Bistrot Gourmand, a stone’s throw away from Marché Forville.

It is located at 10 Rue Docteur Pierre Gazagnaire.

(Photo credit: Trip Advisor)

Looking at the photo, note the discount supermarket next door. Right next to it is the market.

On the other side is — or was — a bar called Les Pénitents (if I remember rightly). This is a nod to the Chapelle de la Miséricorde, which is just across the street from the market and clearly visible from Bistrot Gourmand.

Not far from Les Pénitents is the railway line at the end of the street, busy with commuter and long-distance trains covering the Côte d’Azur. I counted 15 roaring by during our dinner!

It’s a quirky yet historic setting in the oldest part of Cannes.

Guillaume Arragon is the young chef and owner of Le Bistrot Gourmand. His talent and effort has propelled the establishment into the Guide Michelin, Guide Hubert and the Association Française des Maîtres Restaurateurs.

Marc, considerably older, runs the front of house. He is the classic Mr Grumpy of French maître d’s. Unlike the waiters at Le Rendez-Vous, there’s no making friends with him.

A friend of ours who had read the latest must-go restaurant listings in Britain’s Daily Telegraph suggested that we eat at Le Bistrot Gourmand.

Our visit mid-week in June 2015 was a delight. Considering its accolades, it was fairly easy on the pocket as well. Dinner for two came to €102.90, which included a bottle of Château la Calisse (rosé), an AOP Côteaux Varois en Provence from the Cuvée Patricia Ortelli. (Var is the wine-producing département next to Alpes-Maritimes Côte d’Azur.)

Like the owner of Le Bistrot du Suquet, Chef Arragon sources his food locally, particularly from the Marché Forville.

He offers two menus, the Menu Décourverte at €22 and the Menu Gourmet at €32.

We chose the latter. Both of us started with courgette flowers, coated in batter and deep fried, which were filled with fresh goats cheese from the Var. These were nothing short of heavenly. They were much lighter and crisper than those at Mantel, and the yielding, unctuous goat’s cheese melted in the mouth. We could have easily managed another plate!

We then moved on to the steak tartare with matchstick fries. Actually, these are comparable to the old-fashioned thin fries done in beef dripping, the way McDonald’s used to prepare them until the 1980s. I do not know if Arragon is the fry king or if he has an assistant. The chips are fabulously crisp on the outside and stay that way until the end.

The steak tartare was perfect in texture and flavour. I make it at home a few times every summer, based on SpouseMouse’s suggestions. Anyone in a similar situation would do well to order it at a reputable restaurant if or when they visit France, just as a reminder of how it should be done. The texture should be coarse — just blitzed — never fine like ground beef.

For dessert we both had lemon tart ‘revisited my way’. As the first two courses were spectacular, we were willing to try a deconstructed creation.

https://ugc.1001menus.com/2/2/5/2/8/2/1/2/4/4/6/1412366002_457/d305c56580414ca4c126297c8f3360e9.website.jpgWe were not disappointed. SpouseMouse is still talking about it.

(Photo credit: Le Bistrot Gourmand)

A light yet satisfying caramel sauce is on either side of the tart, topped with equally light, melt-in-the-mouth meringue strips.

The tart itself is to die for. The crust is very short, meaning that it’s unbelievably buttery and crispy, like a thin shortbread biscuit but much better, if such a thing can be imagined.

The creamy yet firm lemon custard, if one can call it that, was fresh, tart and unctuous. It defies description. We’ve never had anything like it.

We will definitely return to Bistrot Gourmand and highly recommend it. This was SpouseMouse’s favourite new restaurant on this trip.

A few closing comments. We dined on the terrace. Whilst it is noisy, you get to watch the local street scene. Certain French people prefer to eat inside. An older woman, with her family in tow, bumped into SpouseMouse on the way in — no apology or anything. She and her entourage monopolised Marc’s attention much of the time. How the conversation flowed. Would that he shared a bit of that warmth with the patrons outdoors. His manner alone prevents me from giving five stars to what is a particularly outstanding restaurant on the Cannes scene.

Also, Bistrot Gourmand often takes pre-booked groups of tourists, conference-goers or students. Therefore, the noise level might be fairly high. A large group of American students with their teachers dined indoors on the evening we were there. (They arrived after the Frenchwoman and her family were leaving.) I hope they expanded their gastronomic knowledge and appreciation!

Noise and Marc aside, Bistrot Gourmand should be on the restaurant list of everyone visiting Cannes. It has some of the city’s best food.

Le Rendez Vous RestaurantOne of the restaurants offering the best value for money in Cannes is Le Rendez-Vous, 35 Rue Félix Faure.

(Photo credit: Bermuda Rover)

We have been there on several visits and have not been disappointed.

Granted, the waiters are old school — a bit grumpy until they’ve assessed your appearance, your order and your deportment. By the time you’ve finished your starter, they’ll have warmed up and started a bit of banter. Yet this type of waiter is a dying breed in France. We’ll miss them when they’re gone.

More importantly, Le Rendez-Vous serves huge portions. Go, go, go! This is one restaurant where you can order à la carte without breaking the bank!

They have two prix fixe, or formule, menus: one for €26.50 and one for €35.50. Each offers three courses.

Because I wanted frogs legs (€20) — and this seems to be one of the few remaining places that has them — I ordered à la carte.

SpouseMouse started with an ample serving of calamari fried in light batter (€13, if I remember rightly).

I had the petite friture (€14), which is a ginormous portion of whitebait, beautifully fried, crispy and delicious. If you order this, I recommend splitting it. There is definitely enough for two people! I couldn’t finish it. The waiter politely waited and waited on the sidelines but I was not going to be a member of the clean plate club on that occasion!

Once he picked up my plate, he enquired of a man eating nearby how his dinner was. This chap was in his 40s and even he said, ‘Very good but too much! Too much food!’

SpouseMouse ordered daurade (€22) — sea bream — for the main course. I was given a choice of accompaniment for my frogs legs and, somewhat to our waiter’s consternation, chose ratatouille. Normally, they come with persillade — garlic, parsley and olive oil. (Bermuda Rover has a photo of his frogs legs from Le Rendez-Vous, done accordingly.) So, for a change, I went with my choice and was delighted.

One essential rule governs frogs legs: they are most definitely finger food! If you forget, the waiter will not hesitate to remind you! Ours brought me a finger bowl, which was perfect.

They were generous, messy, delicious and unctuous. They were to die for. I’m still thinking about them a month later!

For dessert, SpouseMouse enjoyed a beautifully presented baba au rhum which came with an additional tot of rum to add to what was already in the delicate cake!

I opted for the fondant au chocolat, served with ice cream and soft fruits. I practically inhaled it. Our waiter joked: ‘Take your time, it’s not going anywhere!’ It was marvellous!

Our wine was a regional rosé: Château Roubine, Cru Classé.

Le Rendez-Vous has been around for years. I always look forward to our dinners there and wish them much continuing success.

You will definitely enjoy it.

They have also opened an oyster bar near the restaurant this summer. I haven’t seen it, but Le Bistrot à Huîtres has, in addition to oysters, a selection of Le Rendez-Vous favourites, new shellfish dishes and salads.

This year, both our fruit trees gave us delightful produce, despite pest problems.

Aphid removal follow-up

At the end of May, our dwarf cherry (Stella) had aphids on top. My gentle soap and water wash worked. Whilst the leaves with the infestation withered, the fruit continued to grow and ripen.

The gooseberry tree, a standard, necessitated aphid removal by carefully wiping the top of the fruit with the corner of a dry paper towel. This was not the easiest operation, particularly as gooseberry trees and shrubs have spiky thorns.

(Photo credit: Ornamental Trees UK)

Gooseberries

Our red gooseberry tree is in its third year of production. It gave us fruit in its first summer, only months after I planted it.

In 2013, we had 100g of gooseberries. Last year, 300g. In 2015, our harvest amounted to 685g, enough for three gooseberry crumbles! I was able to pick the berries in late June, early July and over the past weekend.

For those who have not tried gooseberries before, they are tart and delicious. They are a traditional English fruit. That said, one of my father’s cousins remembered gooseberry pie as standard at a café in America’s Midwest in the 1940s and 1950s. Yet, I’d never heard of them until I moved to the UK.

They freeze well. Top and tail them before putting them in a bag and tucking them away for later. A gooseberry tart or crumble in winter is a delightful reminder of summer.

Some people prefer making jam or chutney, both of which go well with grilled mackerel fillets. The tartness cuts through the fish’s oiliness.

Gooseberries are increasingly hard to find at supermarkets and greengrocers. Most of what is on offer is the green variety. I recently saw red gooseberries online priced at £4.50 for 50g! The tree cost under £10 — I’m quids in!

A gooseberry standard takes up only a square metre of space and is well worth planting, especially since they yield fruit in the first year. I planted mine in November. They come with a bare root, so will require plenty of all-purpose compost.

They require very little maintenance. I give mine some fertiliser in the spring and away it goes.

Cherries

After two years of waiting for cherries, this year our dwarf produced 110g — 15 fruits.

They are large, dark and sweet — just the way I like them.

Buying the dwarf tree was a bit controversial. My better half said they were troublesome to grow: a long wait for fruit (true) and limited lifespan (several years at most). We’ll see. I am considering transplanting it to another part of the garden in September so it has more room. Removal of another tree has opened up a new space.

Ordering advice

Make sure fruit trees are described as ‘self fertile’ before ordering. A catalogue or online display will state this.

Herbs and garlic

In other news, our herbs are having a particularly good season.

Our garlic harvest is imminent. We can hardly wait!

Our tomato and cucumber plants are coming along slowly.

It’s really worthwhile planting something edible in the garden, even where space is limited. Not only does it save money but it is also intriguing to watch the plants grow, flower and produce fruit.

John F MacArthurIn his sermon on Matthew 8:1-4, which I referred to in yesterday’s post, John MacArthur helpfully explains the structure of St Matthew’s Gospel, designed to show us the deity of Christ Jesus.

Excerpts follow, emphases mine:

First chapter: genealogy.  That attested to the legal qualifications of the Messiah.  Second chapter: birth, and all of the fulfillment of prophecy attested to the prophetic qualifications of the Messiah.  And then you come to His baptism: attested to the divine approval of His messiahshipThen you come to the temptation: attested to His spiritual qualifications to be the Messiah.  Then you come to the sermon [on the Mount]: His theological qualifications. And now you come to the miracles, the most essential qualification of all, the proof that He is God.  He’s God.

By the way, chapter 8 begins where chapter 4 left off; the sermon is stuck in the middle. But when we closed chapter 4, do you remember what He was doing? Verse 23?  “And Jesus went all about Galilee, teaching in the synagogues and preaching the gospel of the kingdom, and healing all manner of sickness and all manner of disease among the people.  And His fame went throughout all Syria.  And they brought unto Him all the sick people that were taken with divers diseases and torments, and those who were possessed with demons, those who were epileptic, those who had paralysis, and He healed them.  And there followed Him great multitudes of people from Galilee and Decapolis and Jerusalem and Judea and beyond the Jordan.”  You see, this is right where He left off, isn’t it?  He went up in a mountain, preached a sermon, came down, and started it all over again.  Thousands, uncounted numbers of healings, and He healed all who came to Him.

The first miracle recorded in Matthew’s Gospel is the healing of the leper. MacArthur describes the pattern of miracles in Matthew 8 and 9 and the narrative through Matthew 13:

The 8th chapter through the 12th chapter is really, in many ways, critical to the understanding of the life of Christ and the message of Matthew.  For in this section, Matthew records a series of miracles performed by Jesus Christ.  There are countless thousands of miracles that are done, nine of which he singles out as examples of the power of Jesus Christ. They are really His credentials as the Messiah.  They are those signs which point convincingly to His deity, for only God can do the things that He does.  The sad part is that, after the miracles in chapters 8 and 9, after the preaching that occurs following that, the Jews conclude in chapter 12 that Jesus is of the devil. That was their conclusion.  So in many ways this becomes the heart of Matthew’s message.  Christ does everything possible to manifest His deity, and they conclude exactly the opposite. And then in chapter 13, He turns from the Jews toward the establishment of a Gentile church.  This is a monumental section of Scripture.  Now you’ll notice that it begins with three miracles:  miracle of healing the leper in the first four verses; healing the man with paralysis, verses 5 to 13; and the woman with fever in verses 14 and 15.  This is the opening triad of miracles.  There are nine miracles in these two chapters.  They come in three sections of three:  three miracles, then a response; three miracles, then a response; three miracles, then a response; all designed to manifest the deity of Jesus Christ.

Miracles, you see, were God’s way of attesting to the deity of His Son.  They are creative miracles.  They manifest power that is only defined by the essence of God.  They are things that man could never do.  They are supernatural. 

I will continue to write about the miracles in Matthew 8 as they have been omitted from the three-year Lectionary, widely in use for public worship.

However, understanding more about how Matthew structured his Gospel will help those of us new to the Bible to better understand and appreciate it.

© Churchmouse and Churchmouse Campanologist, 2009-2015. Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this blog’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Churchmouse and Churchmouse Campanologist with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.
WHAT DOES THIS MEAN? If you wish to borrow, 1) please use the link from the post, 2) give credit to Churchmouse and Churchmouse Campanologist, 3) copy only selected paragraphs from the post -- not all of it.
PLAGIARISERS will be named and shamed.
First case: June 2-3, 2011 -- resolved

Creative Commons License
Churchmouse Campanologist by Churchmouse is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 2.0 UK: England & Wales License.
Permissions beyond the scope of this license may be available at https://churchmousec.wordpress.com/.

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 665 other followers

Archive

Calendar of posts

July 2015
S M T W T F S
« Jun    
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031  
Bloglisting.net - The internets fastest growing blog directory
Powered by WebRing.
This site is a member of WebRing.
To browse visit Here.

Blog Stats

  • 804,582 hits
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 665 other followers