The conversations just get more profound in the Tridentine Mass versus Novus Ordo (NO) debate. Vatican II worked out quite well, because, although it was never intended — on paper, at least — to do away with the Latin Mass, in practice, Novus Ordo quickly became the de facto global replacement. Churchmouse Campanologist has a variety of posts on Vatican II, in particular, the Mass.
InsideCatholic.com featured an article recently by John Zmirak. ‘All Your Church Are Belong to Us‘ (as in ‘All Your Base Are Belong to Us’), explores the hijacking by reformer (as opposed to Reformed) Catholic bishops, eager to subvert orthodoxy in the Catholic Church. Thanks to their efforts to ‘modernise’, we have one, if not two, generations of Catholics who don’t understand orthodoxy or the focus of the Mass. Converts and young people who know only Novus Ordo (‘New Order’!) Mass are at loggerheads with the more traditionalist, Tridentine fans (like many of my Catholic readers). The NO types reduce their argument to one of ‘externals’, when that’s really only a tiny part of the story. (Emphases mine below.)
Both the article and subsequent comments are worthwhile reading. First, here are excerpts from the article:
– ‘Having come from churches that didn’t have the Eucharist, and remaining through God’s grace flush with gratitude for the sacraments, many converts really don’t understand what the rest of us are nattering on about … We owe these good people an explanation.’
– ‘While the universal language of the Church is still to be revered for all the reasons that Vatican II prescribed in Sacrosanctum Concilium, it isn’t Why We Fight.’
– ‘The liturgy is miraculous, but it doesn’t work like magic: Rev. Teilhard de Chardin had said the Tridentine Mass for decades even as he invented Catholic Scientology; conversely, his sometime housemate at New York’s St. Ignatius Loyola, the holy Rev. John Hardon, obediently switched missals with every tinkering that came to him from the bishops.’
– ‘The old Mass reminds me of what they used to say about the Catholic Church and the U.S. Navy: “It’s a machine built by geniuses so it can be operated safely by idiots” … The new rite was patched together by bureaucrats, and should only be safely celebrated by the saintly.’
– ‘Here’s what we Trads have realized, that the merely orthodox haven’t: Inessential things have power, which is why we bother with them in the first place. In every revolution, the first thing you change is the flag. Once that has been replaced, in the public mind all bets are off …’
– ‘The perception that the Church was in a constant state of doctrinal flux was confirmed by the reality that her most central, sacred mystery was being monkeyed with — almost every year.’
YES! I remember that ‘doctrinal flux’ well. How many different versions of Missals do I own? What about reception of Communion and the type of Host? Confession? Don’t get me started.
Then, two highly important passages. The first explains what happened next and what Catholics today experience in the pew. This gave us the CINO (Catholic in Name Only):
The campaign of dissenting priests, nuns, and (let’s be honest) bishops culminated, in America, with the Call to Action Conference, which its leading advocate John Francis Cardinal Dearden described in 1977 as “an assembly of the American Catholic community .” This gathering of 2,400 radical Catholic activists was composed of “people deeply involved with the life of the institutional Church and appointed by their bishops” (emphasis added). The Conference approved “progressive resolutions, ones calling for, among other things, the ordination of women and married men, female altar servers, and the right and responsibility of married couples to form their own consciences on the issue of artificial birth control.” This is the mess made by the bishops appointed by the author of Humanae Vitae, which his rightly beloved successor John Paul II spent much of his pontificate trying to clean up. What we Trads feel compelled to point out is that he couldn’t quite finish the job, and that the deformations of the Roman liturgy enacted by (you guessed it) appointees of Paul VI helped enable all these doctrinal abuses. They changed the flag.
And the second explains why traditionalists are upset:
… how it felt to be young and Catholic in the 1970s. Every sacred thing had to be changed, every old thing replaced with a new one, every complicated beauty plastered over by the cheap and the easy. The message was almost subliminal, but by that means all the more powerful: All Your Church Are Belong to Us.
The comments demonstrate the feuding between both sides. Those 45 and younger as well as recent converts side with the modernisers. I wonder if they realise what they are saying with statements such as these:
Dan the Dad: ‘Wow, that’s one seriously long, rambling article. I still can’t figure out why Trads are so crazy about the Tridentine Mass. I would suggest you use bullet points and write a shorter article that is clear … I’m a very orthodox Catholic. I like the Novus Ordo (thought I think it would be better if it were in Latin). I believe the Church is guided by the Holy Spirit and kept free from error. Thus, the Second Vatican Council and the Novus Ordo can not be mistakes.’
You can read the author’s reply in bullet points.
Mary Kay: ‘It’s more than being offended. They’re attacking their brothers and sisters in Christ and rationalizing their doing so.‘
Daria: ‘I feast upon the body and blood of Christ at either form of the mass.’
Croix: ‘Kneeling? Some people kneel before Communion, yes, but somehow it seems like showing off. I usually have an intense desire to prostrate myself but of course I will never to do it.’
Cephas: ‘I’ve attended enough TLM’s to know that for the most part people basically just sit there (or, kneel there: ouch!) for long stretches of time watching the priest and altar boys move around.
‘Actual participation like (gasp!) giving the responses is looked down upon in many Traddie parishes. And, the silence . . . O, the Silence! Silence is overrated. When I’m on retreat at a monastery, I want silence. When I attend a liturgical celebration I don’t want to kneel, sit, stand in silence.’
Marie: ‘… feel free to die in my parish in California (where I am the Liturgy planner). Although far away from an FSSP, I’ll make sure you get the Requiem chant for the Introit, “Dominus pascit me” for Responsorial, the Dies Irae as Sequence, the Jubilate Deo Ordinary with the “Dona eis” at the Agnus Dei, and “Lux aeterna” for Communion. I’ll get the priest to wear black (albeit with the deepest violet sheen) for your glorious send-off. Heck, I’ll even throw in “In Paradisum” at the gravesite, and even “Libera Me.”
‘But it will all be the Novus Ordo, ha-ha!‘
So, Catholic friends and reverent visitors who prefer the Tridentine Rite, you will need to deal with the therapeutic, pomo generation:
– NO (Novus Ordo) Catholics who believe TLM people are ‘attacking’ them and being ‘uncharitable’
– Catholics who are accepting of what ‘Holy Mother Church gives them’ — as if one could compare the solemn and reverent Tridentine Rite to the abomination of the NO
– Catholics who wish to feel comfortable (no kneeling!) and ‘celebrate’ the remembrance of Christ’s holy and living sacrifice
– Catholics who like having their ‘itching ears’ tickled with an easy, fun Mass — the horror!
Now, how is that to be transformed, particularly in light of bishops and priests who can’t be bothered?
This, for me, was the most poignant of comments. Prayers for Another Old Catholic — with whom many can empathise (my emphasis):
I was a child when the mass was changed, when the Blessed Mother’s statue was ‘disappeared’ from her little altar to the left of the main altar, this old and lovely altar later ripped out and replaced by a large dining room table. I was frightened when the priest, instead of facing East with the rest of us turned toward us got between us and God. It seemed to me that we had gone from the worship of God to the worship of the priest. I was a child but I cringed at the bad music with sometimes sacrilegious lyrics. I was robbed of my tradition, and so were the next two generations who never even had the experience of the Traditional Latin Mass..
Even now I often leave the Novus Ordo mass in tears over my loss. The closest TLM near me is an hour away over dangerous roads and my car is also old. All I want is the TLM restored to every parish so that those of us who love it have an equal chance to worship as those who want the Novus Ordo. I want the next generations to have a chance to see what they have been missing before those of us who remember it are gone.
How true. And that’s how I remembered it, too.
15 comments
March 9, 2010 at 9:20 pm
Gabriella
That’s how I also remembered it, Churchmouse, for many years.
John Zmirak’s article is good and he tries to cover all the accusations made by the NO. I believe that the NO are actually beating around the bush – what valid point can they bring up? Everything they say has been refuted over and over again but obviously the answers to their accusations go in one ear and come out the other 😉
LikeLike
March 10, 2010 at 8:45 am
churchmouse
Thanks, Gabriella! I had you and Cinzia in mind when I posted this entry.
I thought the tone of the TLM people was much more objective than that of the NO adherents. What the NO people said was actually quite unpleasant and, dare I say it, militant. ‘Feel free to die in my parish … but it will all be Novus Ordo’? Who discusses death in such a manner and with a perfect stranger? And ‘I can’t figure out why trads are so crazy about TLM … I’m a very orthodox Catholic. I like the Novus Ordo’. An oxymoron at best.
Personally, I agree that there are no valid points about NO to bring up, but, of course, they don’t see it that way. The comments that went with Zmirak’s article indicate that the minds of the laity have been completely transformed, and not for the better.
This reminds me of my post on AA-1025, the Anti-Apostle (included here for readers who haven’t seen it):
Everything he said came true:
‘I prophesied with assurance … the suppression of Latin, of priestly ornaments, of statues and images, of candles and prie-dieu (so that they could kneel no more) …. And I also started a very active campaign for the suppression of the Sign of the Cross.
‘I also prophesied, and we were then in 1940, the disappearance of altars, replaced by a table completely bare, and also of all the crucifixes, in order that Christ be considered as a man, not as a God. I insisted that Mass be only a community meal to which all would be invited, even unbelievers…
‘Mass must only be a community meal for the greatest welfare of human fraternity.’
LikeLike
March 10, 2010 at 5:51 am
Rob
How about a post addressing the latest in a long string of sex scandals?
LikeLike
March 10, 2010 at 8:31 am
churchmouse
Hi, Rob
This blog has already featured two lengthy posts on a bishop from California who was embroiled in sex scandals and one last summer about the children’s homes in Ireland.
But, thanks for bringing up that old canard. /sarc
LikeLike
March 10, 2010 at 9:49 am
Albert Cooper
I live in Norwich England a short walk from St.John the Baptist Cathedral of East Anglia,formerly the largest parish church in the UK.
I was a Treble Chorister/soloist from 1942,and educated in the local Catholic school,I was close to my faith and tradition of liturgy and music.
Then cam Vactican Two.Canon Mcbride the priest in charge took little time in destroying the High Alter dedicated to Father George Fresange and built in order for St.Johns to the be consecrated,as the church had’nt a permanent Alter and paid for by parishioner donations,likewise the Communion Rail and Gates,the Pulpit,all Holy Statues and Artefacts votive candles and the like.All Pre Councilar music,Liber Usualis Latin Masses,Westminster Hymnals etc bonfired.
This priest [still with us at Sheringham} must have hated the Traditional Nature of the faith to do such things.
My Mum and Dad and our family generally,an old Norwich Roman Catholic family,objected quite strongly,but were told to stay away if we did’nt approve of the reforms,to allow “enlightened” Catholics to take the church forward.
We see the result today.Little respect for the Real Presence,the Novo Ordo Masses noisy and unruly.The belief in the Sacrament of Penance almost nil,every one herding to receive Holy Communion in the hand and standing and so on.
I am now 76,my wife and four children are all lapsed,and me really as I attend an Anglo Catholic Church here in Norwich [I know its the real absence}but I find some reverence there for me to say my prayers.
There seems little chance at this time for a Tridentine Mass to be celebrated at St.Johns,the Bishop {a nice man} and the Dean and clergy in general dragging their heels,with alterations still taking place on the former Sanctuary,so as to restore it to its former glory,very difficult,and now expensive.I just hope one day before I die my prayers will be answered
LikeLike
March 10, 2010 at 10:37 am
churchmouse
Hello, Albert — thank you so much for your post. I’ve been reading and rereading it. What a heart-breaking story.
Yes, the priest must have had hate for the Church to do all those things. It must have been alarming and sad for you and your family to witness all this happening. It’s shocking to read. Then to be told that you were free to leave that parish to make way for ‘enlightened’ Catholics? Crikey.
I’m sure you’re getting a much more reverent Communion service with the Anglo-Catholics. (By the way, we believe that the Sacrament is the Real Presence just that the Bible does not support the specifics of transubstantiation (Articles of Faith XXVIII).)
Thank you again for your comment. Hope to hear from you again. And, best wishes to you and the band!
In closing, have you read Damian Thompson today? He has an entry on the Catholic bishops in England and Wales here:
http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/damianthompson/100029211/the-attitude-problem-of-the-bishops-of-england-and-wales/#comments
There’s a commenter called On the Side of the Angels (OTSOTA) who has some incredible things to say about the bishops (two or three long posts), e.g. this one (Mar. 9, 5:28 p.m.):
‘We had a diocesan initiative a few years ago called ‘Build my Church’ – which was basically a futurechurch plan to dismantle any residual Catholicism the professional clergy and laity hadn’t already managed to destroy – and the Bishop ? Well you can guess…
‘What went so wrong ?
Our Bishops are supposed to be preachers of the Gospel, fishers of men, shepherds…
‘At present they just seem to be convinced that the Church is not merely so sick it’s terminal ; to them it’s already dead ! …
‘ …and anyone who thinks any differently ? all these fervent new young traditionalists ? well they’re young – and idealistic – and they don’t know the ways of the world yet – sooner or later they’ll see that this is the end….
‘ …and if there is any Bishop reading this and saying to himself:
“That’s not true !”
‘Prove there’s still hope among you : Prove me wrong !’
LikeLike
March 10, 2010 at 12:23 pm
Albert Cooper
Thank you so much Churchmouse for your sympathetic reply [But who are you?} also that you were aware I was a Jazz and Blues performer {as well as Choir and Oratorio} ? I am interested in your remarks regarding Anglo Catholic Holy Communion,how do you regard my attendance at an Anglo Catholic Mass? a lot of questions I realize!
If the Tridentine Mass were to be celebrated at St.Johns on a Sunday for me to carry out my Sunday Obligation I’d be there like a shot,to renew my devotion in the one true church.
I realize the Mass is valid and the Holy Consecration also valid.but Im afraid I cant take the new liturgy and the general behaviour of “the faithfull” who attend,no doubt I am guilty of the sin of pride
I shall be at Confession on Maunday Thursday at St.Johns,to confess missing Mass amongst others,so I can make my Easter Duties,though I was told by the Priest in the confessional that the important thing was to attend and receive Holy Communion even if I could not get to Confession,the sacrament of Penance,I questioned and said “what even if I was’nt in a state of Grace?” i received no reply,yes or no.This priest was an old man and no doubt was a priest before Vactican Two
LikeLike
March 10, 2010 at 1:36 pm
churchmouse
My sincerest apologies if I alarmed you, Albert, which wasn’t my intent, but if we readers click on your name we arrive at your MySpace page, which I spent time browsing. Most eclectic and enjoyable!
You can read about me on my About page, but, in short, I’m a marketing copywriter (currently ‘resting’). I spent half my life as a Catholic before becoming an Anglican. Here’s my story:
Someone once did a Google search for ‘Reformed Anglo-Catholic’ (‘Reformed’ meaning ‘Calvinist’) to find my blog, and that’s a good description of where I am now. There are a few of us around.
I think it’s great that you are attending an Anglo-Catholic church, especially since behaviour at Mass has slid downhill ever since Novus Ordo truly took hold. Personally, I think more Roman Catholics in the English-speaking world should attend Anglo-Catholic services, but I also have Catholic readers, so I don’t want to make too big a deal about it. You are receiving Christ’s body and blood, which is what matters. Anglican Communion is not like the Methodist or Presbyterian Supper. Unconsumed Anglican hosts are kept afterward for use when priests visit the sick and infirm. I know that for a fact. Methodist bread is thrown out, for obvious reasons.
I can fully empathise with your returning to St John’s if TLM were on offer.
What I have been told by our local Catholic priest is that I am the only one in our area to ask for a Latin Mass at his church. (I, an Anglican, even offered to pay to have a priest come in and say it!) He told me that my ‘lack of spirituality’ was getting in the way of my appreciation of the Novus Ordo. I don’t think so.
Don’t let them tell you that something’s wrong with you — that’s one of their standard tactics. ‘Well, you’re the only one who’s clamouring for this’ or ‘Stop blaming your faults on Novus Ordo — everyone else gets something spiritually enriching out of it’. Bravo Sierra 😉
As far as TLM is concerned, I was finally able to attend one whilst on holiday in France last summer. What a beautiful Mass it was, too:
It’s interesting that an older, pre-V-II priest didn’t strongly advocate going to Confession after missing Mass on Sunday. I’m with you — I would certainly go on Maundy Thursday before receiving Communion on Easter. But, there’s a lot of post-V-II wishy-washiness surrounding Confession now, including the concept of mortal sin, which was very clear even when I was growing up. Now, priests refer to in many cases as ‘serious sin’ and will look the other way as far as receiving Communion is concerned, even if they know the parishoner is not in a state of grace.
It would seem as if there are very few traditionalist priests today. If the older ones have supported the post-V-II perspective, it may be to keep their jobs as parish priests. ‘Go along to get along’. I don’t know. However, there are also a number of parish priests in England who came to ordination late in life after having had a career. Some of them are also converts, and I also know some who spent many years as atheists. They don’t know anything other than V-II, so they don’t really understand traditionalists and are discouraged from doing so, if the Bishops of England and Wales are anything to go by. Those bishops are actively resisting the Holy Father’s call to offer TLM — you don’t need a group to petition for one anymore, just one or two requests will do.
Hope this helps answer your questions. If not, feel free to ask more. To see posts in a particular category, click on one of the tags in the ‘tag cloud’ or use the search facility (both are in the left-hand column).
LikeLike
March 10, 2010 at 2:38 pm
Albert Cooper
Thanks again,all is clear,and Im flattered that you found my Myspace page eclectic !
During my working life I too have been a copy writer The Copy Platform then the body copy.I eventually finished up as a Marketing Director in the Carpet Industry,Exhibition Design etc Carpet Colourist and still writing copy for print amongst other things.
I still perform though 77 years in June ,and in many styles Passion Sunday I am in the St Giles Singers singing a Palastrina Mass,likewise Good Friday at St.Johns Timberhill Norwich a very High Church [they have a web site as does the Roman St Johns}
What is your view re the real prescence in the Anglo Catholic Tradition? I am not incommunion at St Johns Timberhill,and the only member who doesnt go up to receive communion,but Im sure you will understand my dilemna
LikeLike
March 10, 2010 at 3:29 pm
churchmouse
Wow — what an impressive CV. You’re fortunate to have an ongoing career in paid copywriting! There are very few writing jobs out there at the moment for me.
And kudos for singing in the church choir — brilliant! I shall look up the websites for the two St Johns.
Real Presence — Anglicans believe it is there by faith; Catholics would say it isn’t because Anglicans don’t believe in transubstantiation.
Article XXVIII of the 39 Anglican Articles of
FaithReligion states that there is no Scriptural support for transubstantiation. This is what the text says (it’s in the 1662 Book of Common Prayer in the back):‘The Supper of the Lord is not only a sign of the love that Christians ought to have among themselves, one to another, but rather it is a sacrament of our redemption by Christ’s death: insomuch that to such as rightly, worthily, and with faith receive the same, the bread which we break is a partaking of the body of Christ, and likewise the cup of blessing is a partaking of the blood of Christ.
‘Transubstantiation (or the change of the substance of bread and wine) in the Supper of the Lord, cannot be proved by Holy Writ, but is repugnant to the plain words of Scripture, overthroweth the nature of a Sacrament, and hath given occasion to many superstitions.
‘The body of Christ is given, taken, and eaten in the Supper, only after an heavenly and spiritual manner. And the mean whereby the body of Christ is received and eaten in the Supper is faith.
‘The Sacrament of the Lord’s Supper was not by Christ’s ordinance reserved, carried about, lifted up, or worshipped.’
Communion has the Real Presence, whether one receives it in a high church (A-C) or a low church (Evangelical).
All baptised Christians are welcome to receive Communion in the Anglican Church. Priests used to say this at every service, and they should continue doing so, although in the past few years there seems to be a question over whether one even has to be baptised. But that’s another topic, covered here:
Also, please note that one’s soul and mind must be in a suitable state (not for you personally to worry about, I’m sure, but just for the sake of thoroughness):
Article XXIX:
‘The wicked and such as be void of a lively faith, although they do carnally and visibly press with their teeth (as S. Augustine saith) the sacrament of the body and blood of Christ, yet in no wise are they partakers of Christ, but rather to their condemnation do eat and drink the sign or sacrament of so great a thing.’
Now, with regard to the Catholic Church’s perspective, it gets a bit confusing:
“An important note for Catholics: Whilst other churches listed below may allow you, as a baptised Christian, to receive Holy Communion, the Catholic Church technically allows you to receive it, although your parish priest (like ours) will probably say it is forbidden. But, have a look at this passage from the 1993 Directory for the Application of the Principles and Norms of Ecumenism (see p. 4 of this link):
Click to access 18_ncworship.pdf
“Catholics who attend non-Catholic churches are ‘encouraged to take part in the psalms, responses, hymns and common actions of the Church in which they are guests’.”
Incidentally, my mother has received Anglican Communion with me on more than one occasion, and she is one of the world’s most devout Catholics — old school but puts up with Novus Ordo.
So, it’s up to you as to what you choose to do (prayerfully). If you cannot attend a TLM, Anglican Communion is the next best thing, in my opinion. This post describes what it is like up close:
Hope that helps. Would look forward to hearing if you do receive Communion at the Anglican St John’s and what your thoughts are afterward. 🙂
LikeLike
March 10, 2010 at 7:57 pm
Albert Cooper
You are indeed a kindred spirit.
I wander around in a haze,for this very afternoon I paid a visit to the church of my Baptism St Johns Roman Catholic Cathedral Norwich.A new Narthex has been completed,with a shop thats to be titled a Repository! quite traditional,with the Baptismal Font re instated,as previously the Bookshop,so the communal Baptisms ,welcome to our family and so on,now quite not the same,however the Sanctuary barren and unloved.
I thank you for your generosity and understanding to my plightThe clergy still seem to twist the Holy Fathers words though to suit their own agenda which causes me anrguish and pain
LikeLike
May 28, 2010 at 10:37 pm
Woodrow
T’is time to jettison the 60s and call Vatican III. The liturgical wars aren’t going to be resolved by Benedict XVI, the bishops, or the liturgical specialists.
The Church is caught in a time warp somewhere between Trent and the anti-war, civil rights movement of the 70s. The eternal verities of the liturgy are still with us, and tradition as well as modernity will have to be acknowledged sooner or later in the form of a peace treaty. Liturgy as a mix and match of traditions old and new is here to stay. Otherwise, more and more Catholics will swim the Tiber to Berlin, Canterbury, or Constantinople.
Traditionalists keep spreading the myth that the Novus Ordo is the RESULT of a process of protestantizing the liturgy. Actually it is the reverse. Protestants were far more influenced by Vatican II. Today, we have “high church” Methodists and Presbyterians. Ever heard of them before Vatican II?
Lutherans perform our low mass with music in Sweden, Norway, Germany, and here with more dignity and decorum than you will ever find in most Catholic churches. Stations, incense, altar facing the wall or the people, both ways. They have an entire repertoire of music we could easily adopt, and in some cases have already done in some more enlightened Catholic parishes.
Traditionalists, especially the SSPX people, never stop equating the NO with “clown masses”. I’ve yet to attend one of these children’s liturgies, but I know plenty of clowns in parishes who never dress up as one. Beware of the clownish celebrants or deacons who don’t look like Clarabelle!!
Another myth: disrespect resulting from communion in the hand or receiving communion standing has led to the rejection of transubstantiation.
The Gallup organization found 40% of Catholics in the USA in 1967 had already rejected transubstantiation. The questioning of Catholic beliefs has been going on despite Vatican II, not because of it.
Now there are calls for a return to conciliarism, gallicanism, and take me back to the Council of Constance as a way of settling Church disputes. The Church is coming apart and Vatican III may be the only way to start repairing it.
LikeLike
May 28, 2010 at 11:03 pm
churchmouse
Wow — what a lot of complexities, so eloquently expressed. Many thanks for such a considered comment.
I wonder if the V-II clergy envisaged Protestant churches returning to their traditional Reformation roots by seeing what happened with the Novus Ordo? I have been trying, without much success, to persuade Catholics to see that Protestants can often be more reverent than they (Catholics) are on Sundays. Would that one could combine traditionalist Lutheran, Anglican and Presbyterian Sunday services in one — bliss!
I cannot think of any of my relatives alive today, bar one (aged 90), who still believes transubstantion takes place. And the heritage of both sides of my family were reverent, devout Catholics — every grandparent and aunt and uncle.
I don’t know if a V-III could produce a return to the true Church, although it would be nice to think so. I feel for B XVI, but I the hidden story may be that the Vatican has many apostates within its walls. I am not sure that traditionalists have faced up to that very present reality, even though they see it playing out in their parish churches daily.
Have you read my post about the supposed Agent 1025, the Anti-Apostle?
Check it out and see what you think. Would be happy to hear from you again.
All best wishes. God bless you.
LikeLike
May 30, 2011 at 1:07 pm
Thom Nickels
THE BLACK MASS WITHIN VATICAN WALLS
Thom Nickels
A recent US Catholic bishops meeting in Baltimore made a claim that there were far too few active Catholic priests familiar with the rite of exorcism.
The old rite, as it turns out, has fallen into disuse, and it’s no wonder. The modern age has redefined evil along abstract lines. There may be evil thoughts and evil deeds like murdering newborns or slitting the throat of one’s grandmother, but to say that there are distinct evil entities who have influence over our lives has become the punch line of late night TV jokes.
It’s considered unsophisticated to talk about “Satan” or “Lucifer” as if they were “real” presences with authentic power. This is so despite the willingness of people to mention God as a force for “good.” References to God garner no awkward glances.
Images (or the idea) of devils have always evoked special attention. Unlike werewolves or mythical Frankenstein monsters, the legacy of devils is not relegated to the realm of the mythical.
That’s why When the US bishops called for more priest exorcists, I thought of film Rosemary’s Baby. The Polanski film of 1968 had at its theme secret rituals and ceremonies as well as a secret society of Satanists masquerading as contemporary humanists who would no more admit to a belief in Satan than they would Martians inhabiting the bodies of humans. Satan, it’s been said by saints and theologians, does not want people to believe in him, and therein lies his greatest power.
While the Catholic Church claims it needs more exorcists, according to Papal insider (and now deceased) Jesuit theologian, Malachi Martin, the Catholic Church may need an exorcist.
Martin, who died in 1996, says that at the height of the Second Vatican Council in Rome, there was a ceremony to enthrone Lucifer in the Vatican (and the Chair of Peter). The church in question, Saint Paul’s chapel within the Vatican walls, hosted a very different rite of Mass on January 29, 1963, just one week after the election of Pope Paul VI. (Years later, according to Fr. Martin, Pope Paul VI would write a note to his successor, John Paul II, and tell him of this ceremony.) Paul VI is also famous for his statement, “The smoke of Satan has entered the sanctuary.”
For decades this statement has been the source of much confusion and controversy, but when paired with Fr. Martin’s testimony, it fits like the lost part of a puzzle.
The ceremony, Fr. Martin is on record as saying, was a black Mass, or the Traditional Latin Mass said in reverse, complete with an animal sacrifice and a drugged young girl who may or may not be the victim of ceremonial sexual rituals. The ceremony was not the Novus Ordo Mass because, in Fr. Martin’s words, “even the Satanists know that this Mass is not valid.” Martin writes that the Black Mass was attended by high ranking prelates in the Church, important layman, business leaders and politicians. At least one Cardinal was in attendance. A concurrent “Enthronement of Satan” black Mass was also held in South Carolina on that date.
In his novel, ‘Windswept House,’ which Fr. Martin always maintained was 90% fact and 10% fiction, the opening chapter describes this Mass.
“…In an atmosphere of darkness and fire, the Chief Celebrant in each Chapel intoned a series of Invocations to the Prince. The Participants in both Chapels chanted a response. Then, and only in America’s Targeting Chapel, each Response was followed by a Convenient Action—a ritually determined acting-out of the spirit and the meaning of the words.”
The presiding Bishop then considered the Victim. “Even in her near unconscious state, still she struggled. Still she protested. Finally, the Bishop began the Great Invocation: ‘’I believe that the Prince of the World will be enthroned this night in the Ancient Citadel, and from there He will create a New Community: the Universal Church of Man.”
Fr. Martin’s best selling book, ‘Hostage to the Devil,’ described the priest’s years as an exorcist. Some Vatican insiders insisted that Fr. Martin had an axe to grind, while others attempted to destroy his credibility with stories of immoral behavior and illicit affairs with the wives of friends. Towards the end of his life, despite a liberal sojourn when he worked for Cardinal Bea during the time of the Council, Fr. Martin maintained that the Catholic Church was in apostasy. He pointed to “liberal, heretical” theologians like Charles Curran and Hans Kung, as being given slaps on the wrist for ascribing to heretical doctrines but still allowed to practice as Catholic priests, while those whose only goal was to preserve tradition, such as Archbishop Lefebvre, were excommunicated by then Pope John Paul II (that excommunication was summarily lifted by Pope Benedict VI).
Martin (who stated that only a future pope could exorcize the Church) is not the only authority to confirm that there’s a secret cabal of Satanists and Freemasons high up in the Catholic Church.
Father Gabriele Amorth, the one time Chief Exorcist in Rome wrote in his book, “Memoirs of an Exorcist: My Life fighting against Satan,” that there are active Satanic sects within the Vatican “where participants reach all the way to the College of Cardinals.” This infiltration of Satanists and Masons forms what Martin calls the Vatican “superforce,” or an organization of powerful prelates who work to destroy the Catholic Church from within.
In Rosemary’s Baby, Mia Farrow’s character has to deal with doctors and psychiatrists whose mission is to trick her into believing she’s having a normal baby. As the mother of Lucifer’s son, she must never know the facts about the true nature of her baby until after its birth.
Like Mia Farrow, the Catholic Church has been tinkered with by forces that have snuck inside the gates. The Church has been fed Rosemary’s chocolate mousse laced with Tannis Root.
The slow and insidious impregnation began as early as the 1930s and 40s when former United States Communist Party member, Bella Dodd, testified before the House on Un-American Activities in 1952 that the Communist Party in the 1930s “put eleven hundred men into the priesthood in order to destroy the Church from within. ”
Dodd told the Committee, “Right now they are in the highest places, and they are working to bring about change in order that the Catholic Church will no longer be effective against Communism.”
The change, Dodd asserted, “Would be so drastic that you will not recognize the Catholic Church.”
Confirming Dodd’s testimony, another former American Communist Party official, Manning Johnson, told the HUAC that, “…the Communists discovered that destruction of religion could proceed much faster through infiltration of the Church by Communists operating within the Church itself.”
While the Council itself did not call for the radical changes and abuses that occurred over the last 40 years, “the spirit of Vatican II” led bishops to implement changes not authorized by the Council or the Pope. One such change was that regional conferences of bishops were given new powers that would later work to distort and change the original intention of the Council. One example is the Council’s insistence that Latin be retained as an essential part of the Catholic Mass. Conferences of regional bishops kicked this mandate to the curb in the name of “the spirit of Vatican II”
Catholic life in the 1970s had become a choreographed danse macabre, according to Dr. John C. Rao, an Associate Professor of History at New York’s St. John’s University. Writing in Love in the Ruins, Modern Catholics in search of the Ancient Faith, Dr. Rao posits that entering into a dialog with the “Neo Catholics” was nearly impossible. “I simply found no means of engaging a discussion with Whirling Dervishes in the grip of renewal fever.” Dr. Rao writes. “All of their man-centered activities were defended by them with reference to the obvious guidance of a Holy Spirit whom I was said to despise, a Holy Spirit who had suddenly and inexplicably exchanged His friendship for Catholic Tradition for a Shiva-like passion for its annihilation. Mockery and distortion of Traditionalist arguments were the unchanging weapons in the progressive arsenal in those days…”
Mary Ann Kreitzer, founder and president of Les Femmes, a Catholic group, writing in the same anthology, recalls home liturgies with “liberation theology” angles preached by Franciscan priests who then went on to celebrate a “noisy guitar and tambourine hootenanny home Mass with one of the priests presiding.”
And what, if anything, did Malachi Martin know about Archbishop Annibale Bugnini, the designer of the Novus Ordo Mass? Was Bugnini, who was eventually dismissed from his post, part of the secret cabal behind Vatican Walls?
After all, it was Bugnini who said, “We must strip from our Catholic prayers and from the Catholic liturgy everything which can be the shadow of a stumbling block for our separated brethren, that is, for the Protestants.”
Years later, Pope Benedict XVI would add that “everything rises or falls with the Liturgy.” New Mass, new religion; it’s only natural then that there were post Council aftershocks.
Vatican II’s imprint on the liturgical life of the Church was for many, including this writer, devastating. Gregorian chant and Mozart were kicked to the curb and replaced with insipid hymns like “On Eagles Wings” and bad folk music. The Great Dumbing Down also affected Catholic Church architecture: Beautiful churches were stripped of their high altars, statues and mosaics in the name of “ecumenicalism.” In the American Church especially, experimentation and excess imploded with clown and jazz masses, Gucci nuns in lipstick and puffed up (or puffed down) feminist hairdos, some of whom were now calling God, “Mother Goddess” and intoning the virtues of WICCA.
In the whacky 1970s a priest might jump out from the sanctuary and do dance numbers in front of the congregation, tassel with a hula hoop, or shuffle about as if reliving his youth in New York’s Peppermint Lounge. It was the age of the “cool” priest with the lascivious wink, a time when pretty much anything was acceptable if the parish priest said it was okay, even if that meant calling for a Board of Directors to replace the Papal Office in Rome.
Was this further proof of the smoke of Satan?
.
The Church in the 1970s seemed to be on a fast lane to the heart of the 21st Century. In the end, however, instead of unity with Protestants the fruits of the Council were factionalism and schism. Traditionalist Catholics dubbed the Novus Ordo Church as misguided, while others formed organizations like the Society of Saint Pius X. When traditionalist seminaries and convents began springing up (most of them filled to capacity, by the way, as opposed to their half-empty Novus Ordo counterparts), the Church realized it had a problem.
“The Catholic Church is really two Churches now,” as one priest said to me recently.
THE REAL DEVIL EMERGES
The relaxation of the role of the priesthood, what Kreitzer calls a “denigration of genuine priestly charism of the ordained while instilling a false sense of clericalism in the laity,” helped contribute a worldwide sex abuse scandal lying dormant but that would soon emerge, like a full blown virus, many years down the road. “It fit with the times when priests were encouraged to escape the sanctuary while the laity flocked to it,” Kreitzer writes, meaning that, if the Church could change a 1500 year old liturgy in a couple years, then anything was changeable—and possible, even behavior related to Allen Ginsberg’s famous line, “This form of life needs sex.”
While some sexual abuse cases occurred prior to the Council, most occurred in the 1960s and 70s when the Church was in the midst of its so-called “springtime.”
According to Thomas Plante, Professor and Chair of Psychology, Santa Clara University, the average age of the priest abuser in 2002 was 53. That means that the vast majority of abuse cases coming to light today are from 20, 30 and 40 years ago, the post Vatican II years, when ‘ liturgical experimentation’ was at its height. At that time not much was understood about sexual abuse. It wasn’t until the early 1980s, as Plante suggests in his book, “Bless Me Father for I Have Sinned,” that serious research began in this area.
Abuser priests identified by Church authorities 20, 30 or 40 years ago, were given the usual Bayer Aspirin treatment: a therapeutic slap on the wrist, 30 days of isolated prayer in a faraway retreat. After that, they were discreetly recycled and farmed out to a different parish setting. It was all very much like signing off on a traffic ticket, or getting your mouth washed out with soap, sans the obligatory cold shower.
No doubt a few astute souls at that time questioned this cavalier method of treatment, but they weren’t many. Most Church authorities accepted the ‘slap on the wrist” as status quo treatment, comparable perhaps to the rather benign penalties imposed on men and women who had sex with minors in the free-wheeling Seventies.
The latest clergy sexual abuse cases emerging from Philadelphia are certainly not the end of the scandal, either.
The last fifty years has not been good years for the Catholic Church.
More astonishing still, much of this sad saga may have something to do with Malachi Martin’s claim that there once was a Black Mass within the Vatican walls.
Thom Nickels
LikeLike
May 30, 2011 at 8:59 pm
churchmouse
Thank you, Thom, for your essay. Clearly, something is wrong not only within the Catholic Church but in Christianity altogether. This may be some of Satan’s best work to date.
May I suggest that all Christians — regardless of denomination — pray regularly, read the Bible and ensure their family lives are true to what Jesus and His Apostles preached.
The ‘slap on the wrist’ treatment diminishes what our grandparents taught us (through our parents).
No, the past half-century has not been good to the Church. All Her faithful have seen it coming, Catholic and Protestant.
Thank you, Thom, for your considered comment. May God bless you.
LikeLiked by 1 person