During the 1990s, the then-new Archbishop of Canterbury, George Carey, declared it the Anglican Decade of Evangelism. The jewel in the crown of this decade was a new programme called the Alpha Course.
I remember receiving a call from a lady at our church in the mid-1990s. ‘Won’t you come join us? It will be a wonderful evening and you can make new friends.’ It was tempting to ask, ‘Aren’t you a bit old to be taken in by this?’ I was still a bit vexed that fripperies like the Toronto Blessing had been all over the news in Britain just a couple of years before in 1994. It looked absurd and, as I told Spouse Mouse then, it would contribute to the downfall of the Church. Well, most people in Britain now think that any Christian is a hysterical, Bible-brandishing loony who has lost his intellectual capacity to reason.
But this weird and wonderful new initiative of the Anglican Church persisted and Alpha was the result. Alpha became a household word nearly 20 years ago, but it was around long before that. It started at Holy Trinity Brompton (HTB) in London in 1979 by the Revd Charles Marnham as an introduction to Christianity for enquirers. It would be held in a ‘relaxed and informal setting’. In 1990, Marnham’s colleague, the Revd Nicky Gumbel, a former barrister who discovered Jesus and sought ordination, took over the Alpha Course at HTB. Gumbel’s way with words, befitting an attorney who argues cases in court before a judge, was a star turn. The church was soon drawing middle-class people from all over London. Many had good-paying jobs with long hours in the City. Others were lost and trying to cope with personal issues. Some had no faith at all but felt the need to know more about Christianity.
So, what happened that made it so successful?
It was while leading his second Alpha course that Nicky made a discovery, which transformed the church’s whole approach to the course and gave it a new dynamic. As he looked around the 13 members of his ‘small group’, he realized to his surprise that apart from the three Christian helpers, all the other 10 members of the group were non-churchgoers.
“They had all the normal objections: ‘What about other religions?’; ‘What about suffering?’, and so on – and we had a stormy first six weeks,” he said. Then they went away on the weekend and all 10 announced their Christian conversion together.
The experience transformed Nicky’s thinking about Alpha. He realized how this simple course in basic Christianity could become a powerful medium for evangelism. He quickly worked to give the course the kind of ‘feel’ that would be particularly attractive to non-churchgoers.
At HTB, attendees meet in the evenings at church for dinner, then hear a talk about the designated topic. They then break out into small groups for further discussion, asking questions or expanding on how particular New Testament passages or stories impact their personal lives.
In smaller parishes, Alpha is held at someone’s home. A potluck dinner is shared, then the talk and discussion follow. Nicky was careful to make it clear that:
… no question should be treated as too trivial, threatening or illogical. Every question would be addressed courteously and thoughtfully – and none would ever be ‘pestered’ if they chose not to continue with the course.
Nicky Gumbel explains: “It’s all friendship-based. There’s no knocking on doors – it’s friends bringing friends.”
And this is how it came to be marketed in churches. By the time the Millenium approached, the Alpha Course had spread from Britain to other countries in the English-speaking world. By the end of 2001, total worldwide Alpha attendance had reached 3.8 million people.
I’ve seen three documentaries — each with several episodes — on the Alpha Course. No Biblical inerrancy is affirmed and no Church history is presented, but there is much which is experiential and emotional. This is what concerns me and those who have delved deeper into the course.
A number of prominent church organisations and clergy heartily endorse the Alpha Course. Among them are Rick Warren, the Salvation Army, the Revd J I Packer of Regent College and evangelist Luis Palau. And Alpha can be adapted for any church, including Catholic parishes. Surely that’s a good thing, you say. Don’t forget that good people can sometimes get subsumed by the wrong thing in the right package.
Those taking Alpha are strongly encourage to commit not only to weekly attendance over several weeks but to a weekend retreat near the end of the course. Sometimes this retreat is described as the ‘Holy Spirit Weekend’. Attendees are encouraged to welcome the Holy Spirit into their hearts and lives through a charismatic experience. Ideally, everyone has one of these experiences before the weekend is over. It is seen as a sign of conversion and being born again. If this sounds a bit like the Toronto Blessing, you would not be wrong.
Understand the Times explains the link between the two in ‘Alpha: Another Road to Rome?‘
… the effectiveness of the course was not realized until a few years later after the “Toronto Blessing” was transported to England from Canada in May of 1994. It was then that Church leaders of Holy Trinity Brompton received a dose of the “blessing” through Elli Mumford who had just returned from Toronto.
On May 24, 1994, Elli Mumford met with several leaders of Holy Trinity Brompton. As Mumford prayed at this meeting, the “transferable blessing” from the Toronto Airport Vineyard was manifest. Sandy Millar, the highly regarded vicar of Holy Trinity Brompton, decided that Elli would preach the following Sunday morning. After giving her testimony about her ‘Toronto experience,’ Elli asked the congregation to stand while she prayed the Lord would bless and give them all He had. Immediately people began to laugh hysterically, weep, shake, jerk, bark and roar.
So, it’s possible to ‘transfer’ a Charismatic blessing from one church and one person to another? Hmm.
Cephas Ministry, which has researched Alpha, asks ‘Is It the Final Answer or a Fatal Attraction?’:
Addressing Alpha Deficiencies, Alan Howe informs us: “Central to the Alpha Course is not the Christian gospel, but the so-called ‘Holy Spirit Weekend’ which is in fact a thinly-disguised opportunity for initiation into the Toronto Blessing experience … An unknown evangelistic tool had thus become a syncretistic mixture of orthodoxy and heresy.”
In Alpha Shake and Bake, [G. Richard] Fisher stated, a close look at the words of Nicky Gumbel, a former atheist, as quoted by the Christian Research Network Journal, show the real direction of the Alpha Course. Gumbel unashamedly is trying to move people into esoteric experiences, altered states of consciousness, self-hypnosis and mindless emotionalism and then tell his followers it is all of God. Gumbel uses “God’s words” to move people toward the ultimate end which is hysteria, loss of control and mindlessness.
And what happens if you cannot have this ‘experience’? As early as 1996, when Alpha was taking off nationwide in Britain, The Times (London) reported:
A woman has walked out of her church and is holding services in her living room, because she says she cannot bring herself to “snort like a pig and bark like a dog” on a Church of England course. Angie Golding, 50, claims she was denied confirmation unless she signed up for the Alpha course, which she says is a “brainwashing” exercise where participants speak in tongues, make animal noises and then fall over.
She has left the evangelical St Marks in Broadwater Down, Kent, with 14 members of the congregation and founded a church at home in Tunbridge Wells. She said: “I’ll be a fool for the Lord any day, but I won’t be a fool for man.”
Deception in the Church, in an article entitled ‘The Dangers of the Alpha Course’, points out:
The men who designed this course are laying error alongside truth, introducing error secretly (“pareisaxousinin” in Greek) the result of which will ruin the faith of the believer in the end …
Perhaps the preachers and evangelists who have endorsed this course need to take a longer look at their Bibles. Jesus NEVER laid hands on his disciples, the result of which were “manifestations” of uncontrollable laughter, mayhem, shaking, animal noises, vomitting, or any of the other demonic disorder of the Toronto and Brownsville “things”.
In the documentaries I’ve seen, not everyone has a charismatic experience. Sometimes, one or two people leave the course at the weekend when things get too weird. They also tend not to return to church. Even for those who stay the course, as it were, only half or slightly more than half decide to seek baptism or church membership. Those who walk away say that Alpha has been a useful experience and has helped them gain a better perspective on their lives.
Those who walk away with nothing understandably think that Alpha is presenting the true God, the true Bible, the true Church, the true Jesus. It’s a crying shame.
Tomorrow: Alpha’s brand of Jesus
For more information, see:
The Alpha Course: Is It the Final Answer or a Fatal Attraction?
22 comments
March 10, 2010 at 4:52 am
D. Philip Veitch
Very, very perceptive and saavy. Many thanks.
The time coordinates offerred above appear in connection with the barkings, fits of hilarity, etc., that transformed Westminster Chapel’s services into a Circus and Carnival.
Churchmen ought rally around solid Reformed materials from http://www.ligonier.org. Used it for years in ministry.
ABC Parker and Grindal would have agreed with me.
LikeLike
March 10, 2010 at 9:31 am
churchmouse
You’re welcome! So glad you liked the post!
I didn’t realise that Westminster Chapel’s services also went for this charismatic business. What a shame.
Thanks for mentioning Ligonier. I have added it to my Resources section. (Took Monergism off when they featured Mark Driscoll — a no-no.)
One of the things I find a bit puzzling is the proliferation of former atheists becoming ordained (e.g. Nicky Gumbel). I actually know quite a few former atheist priests in the UK. I’m not sure their theology is all that sound. It seems a bit New Age to me — very much in the experiential, quiet prayer realm. And, the words not to mention around them are ‘Calvinist’ or ‘Reformed’! (I know from personal experience.)
LikeLike
March 12, 2010 at 4:03 am
D. Philip Veitch
1. Yes, re: Westminster Chapel. I did research on Arthur Blessitt’s role and relationship to Westminster Chapel, 1986-1996. Blessitt is a TBN-Word of Faith fellow who traipsed the world with a cross on his back. The whole “Toronto Blessing” phenemona descended. A “Dr. Kendall ______” came to Westminster in the 80’s (?). He prepped the path for a number of years. By 1995ish-1996ish, barking, fits of hilarity, visions, etc. One account by Banner of Truth writer detailed a “staid London banker”
rolling around on the floor in fits of hilarity–right behind the august pulpit from which Dr. Martyn Lloyd-Jones preached.
BTW, in the research on Blessitt, he left his wife of 30 years with several children, divorced her, and married “3 weeks later” a 29-year old red head from Westminster Chapel. Blessitt was 49 at the time.
I called TBN, the huge satellite outfit here in the States re: the Westminster situation with Blessitt and his divorce/remarriage, but didn’t get too far. Egregiously poor answers, as expected.
2. I haven’t done my homework on Driscoll other than a few casual contacts through blogs and some youtubes. This much, something is not right.
3. Ligonier is sound. I own nearly the entire inventory of DVD/VHS/audio and books resources. Taught many of their courses too. They don’t have an Anglican flavour—I mean the the Prayer Book flavour of the English Reformers pre-Laud. But of course, Ligonier has exactly the theology of those three Archbishops of Elizabeth 1 and the first ABC of James 1. Things go south with that hapless ABC Laud.
However, while not an old BCP service, worshipping with R.C. at St. Andrew’s Chapel, Orlando, FL is almost liturgical and Anglican. Wonderful music, prayers, hymns, architecture and the old Master in the pulpit. Stellar stuff. The theology is outstanding and the applications too,
LikeLike
March 11, 2010 at 12:19 am
Alpha’s brand of Jesus « Churchmouse Campanologist
[…] Evangelical, heresy, Protestant A Protestant marriage counsellor whom I know says that the Alpha Course can make people overly hopeful about situations in their lives which cannot be overcome. One of […]
LikeLike
March 12, 2010 at 12:04 pm
churchmouse
Hi, Phil
Wow — thanks for the info about Westminster Chapel and St Andrew’s Chapel. Talk about two different churches and approaches.
I wish St Andrew’s and RC Sproul much continued success. Their plans for expansion look great (I watched the video and read the brochure). Sound theology works.
Re Westminster Chapel — I found the Banner of Truth link to which you refer:
http://www.banneroftruth.org/pages/articles/article_detail.php?576
What a story! Too bad they didn’t include more about Blessit (perfect name for a clergyman). Dr Kendall sounds interesting, for lack of a better word:
– radical change in worship style
– saying Blessit was ‘so much like Jesus’
– ‘what Kendall endorses was the use of texts, interpreted without reference to their original sense, but quoted as newly “given” to the recipient in quite a different sense’
– ‘Kendall saw “God’s seal” on the introduction of the altar-call’
– Dr Lloyd-Jones’s funeral arrangements, where Kendall insisted on showing up
– wanting ‘many conversions . . . accompanied by signs and wonders’ (never happened)
– saying to a deacon, ‘How dare you touch me, the Lord’s Anointed?’
Incidentally, Westminster Chapel is offering Alpha this month at the Ha Ha Bar & Grill in Cardinal Walk:
http://www.westminsterchapel.org.uk/ministries/
LikeLike
March 31, 2010 at 3:18 am
Better late than never « M.G. Writers
[…] had a discussion on the Alpha course , which I thought I had never heard about when I first read the post. Last night, I was clearing […]
LikeLike
August 7, 2010 at 7:26 am
rochelle gritton
Please can you tell me where alpha courses are run in bowers gifford essex. Post code ss13 2lg. many thanks
LikeLike
August 7, 2010 at 8:52 pm
churchmouse
Hello, Rochelle — I don’t know, as my series of Alpha posts is meant to discourage people from attending. Please try to avoid Alpha. Find a good, solid Bible study at a reputable church instead. You would do better reading some of the Calvinist (Reformed) or Lutheran blogs and resources I have listed (see Blogroll and Resources in the left-hand column).
Try Bible Bulletin Board under Resources as a starting point. John MacArthur’s sermons there really bring the Bible to life and are fascinating to read. He also has another site called Grace To You (also listed in Resources).
Best wishes for your study of Scripture. God bless you.
LikeLike
August 30, 2010 at 2:47 am
Matters not.
Hello,
U try to discourage people from attending the alpha course. Do u have a complete package which can effectively deliver the good news to an atheist? I would find that probably gr8!!! I just watched the Intro and 1st chapter of the Alpha course DVD and it seems well packaged for delivery to an atheist for self-reflection. I don’t need the alpha course anyway and I’ve not watched it in full but i have an atheist friend who could find it helpful and the only way that can be useful to her is if we start from the historical evidence, etc… as in the alpha course (at least the 1st 2 section)…….Remember she was born and raised an atheist.
LikeLike
August 30, 2010 at 2:58 am
churchmouse
Please see my answer to Rochelle Gritton immediately above your comment.
LikeLike
September 10, 2010 at 5:59 pm
Christopher
FIRSTLY, you belong to Jesus and His church. Please don’t blog erroneous nonsense about the Alpha Course, when you’ve clearly never even been to one and you’re not relying on firsthand knowledge, just rumours. Aside from bearing false witness, you’re not even contributing to any kind of debate. So you watched some documentaries?!
If you think “most people in Britain now think that any Christian is a hysterical, Bible-brandishing loony who has lost his intellectual capacity to reason”, because of the ALPHA Course (?!), then you’re out of touch with people and ignorant of Richard Dawkins, Christopher Hitchens and the effect of general ‘New Atheism’, also spread for a long time through state school teaching. It’s ironic you think this about a course clearly dedicated to intellectual discussion and sharing Jesus through weekly ‘talks’ (sermons).
If you think people are ‘hypnotised’ into life-changing experiences of the Holy Spirit on the weekend away, then you’re very seriously ignorant about the Alpha Course weekend away, hypnotism, and any work of the Holy Spirit that’s slightly beyond your personal understanding or comfort zone.
If you think Biblical inerrancy is not taught during Alpha, then once again you’re alarmingly wrong. It’s taught from the start and relied on and implied all the way throughout the 10 weeks of teaching. Alpha doesn’t “rely on charismatic techniques” – it heavily and explicitly relies on Jesus. Your whole line of reasoning and clear phobia against anything even slightly ‘charismatic’ is bizarre and messy throughout this entire blog entry.
You say Alpha “will not answer your questions on the Triune God, how the books of the Bible fit together, the difference between the Old and the New Testament covenants” and we’ll learn nothing of “the state of the Church today”. You’re simply, totally, wrong. You don’t know the Alpha teaching at all. That’s a complete falsehood. Why are you saying this? It’s extemely distressing.
SECONDLY, why not be positive? Why not say, “Alpha’s a great initiative, but I’d change this”? If you think God doesn’t / can’t work through Alpha, even if it has some ‘deficiencies’, in your opinion…well, I just don’t know what to say to that. Your own personal ideas and intricate theology do not have a monopoly on salvation. Arminians go to heaven too. So do non-traditional worshippers. We’re allowed to work together out of love.
If you think that Bible studies (I love your divisive emphasis on ‘Calvinist’) are the way to reach alcohol and sex worshipping Britain, and get people interested in church again and meeting Jesus, then you’re just not living in the real world. Have you noticed – they don’t come? They don’t come to church. You need to get to know some real non-Christians. They don’t even BELIEVE in the Bible! And they want a God who they can not only know about and believe in, but also experience. Alpha is a first stepping stone they can be comfortable with. Can you not remember the time before you were born again? Alpha is completely perfect for reaching people where THEY are – not where YOU are. Something God is in the business of. Alpha deserves all the blessings our amazing God has clearly bestowed upon it. Your views on Alpha are extremely wrong, not to mention bizarre. Find out some more about it and rejoice!
LikeLike
September 10, 2010 at 6:13 pm
churchmouse
Thank you for your calmly reasoned ‘Christian’ comment. ::clears throat::
No, I was never ‘born again’.
I have carefully researched my series of posts on Alpha. Please note the links therein. I am sorry that they do not meet with your approval and that you needed to lash out.
May God bless you and bring you to His truth (outside of Alpha)
Churchmouse
LikeLike
December 2, 2011 at 12:42 pm
a Missionary
my you are really a legend in your own mind, i thank God that Jesus is being preached Alpha or what ever, do you not believe that the Spirit of Christ can bring believers to the end or do you think the Promises of Jesus in the four Gospels are up for debate?
Judge not and be not judged
LikeLike
December 2, 2011 at 12:53 pm
churchmouse
Hello, A Missionary. I pointed out Alpha’s errors in a series of posts. Christians are obliged to point out theological error to other believers.
LikeLike
September 10, 2010 at 6:50 pm
Christopher
Sorry for ‘lashing out’. I tried to be positive at the end! The thing is, when you publish things which are (I’m sorry) inaccurate, it can understandably be provocative and upsetting. Like I said, please look at the Alpha Course material yourself. You will find that many of your statements about its teaching are seriously, seriously incorrect. Yes, I have read most of those links before, and I would say exactly the same about them. From what I’ve seen, the way God uses Alpha is incredible – that’s why I strongly feel it needs defending.
I’m genuinely curious though…I don’t understand what you mean, never ‘born again’…?
God bless you too. Whatever disagreements we may have, we’re both brothers working for Jesus. I apologise for the harshness in my previous post.
LikeLike
September 10, 2010 at 7:56 pm
churchmouse
Not all of us are ‘born again’, Christopher: Catholics, non-Charismatic Anglicans, many Methodists, almost all Lutherans, Presbyterians and Reformed (Calvinists) unless they were so previously as a Charismatic Evangelical, Pentecostal or similar.
I really think that if you read some of the blogs and resources I have listed you’ll get a better idea. If you’ve not soured on it, you can try some of the other entries on my blog, including Forbidden Bible Verses or its summary, Essential Bible Verses.
I thoroughly recommend Matthew Henry (English, 17th c.) and John MacArthur (American, present-day) for some great commentary on Scripture. They’re normally featured at the end of my Forbidden Bible Verses posts.
Glad we could agree to disagree. I wish you all the best on your journey with Scripture.
Must go now — dinner is served. 🙂
LikeLike
October 2, 2010 at 3:49 pm
Christopher
Yes, I quickly looked through your Forbidden Bible Verses and it was very good to check out. It’s good to see someone unafraid to publish the truth of God’s Word and to bring out parts of if which are challenging. Thankfully I’ve never had to belong to a church that would ever consider these verses, or any other part of scripture, to be ‘forbidden’ or tip-toed around.
I’m still confused though to be honest – I’ve literally never heard a Christian of any denomination claim they are not born again. Why are so many in the Kingdom of God not born again, in your view? That seems to contradict Jesus’ teachings…John 3:3 seems very clear (also 2 Cor. 5:17…and the rest of the New Testament)…do you perhaps mean ‘born again’ in some different terminology?
LikeLike
October 2, 2010 at 9:37 pm
churchmouse
For the traditional denominations, baptism is being ‘born again of water’. Confirmation is being ‘born again of the Spirit’.
The evangelical (modern ‘born again’ sense) movement was started only in the 18th century — a revivalist phenomenon which began with the First Great Awakening, described here:
Among its preachers were Jonathan Edwards, John Wesley and George Whitefield. It has since infiltrated other denominations to lesser or greater extents. But, not all evangelical churches in mainstream denominations are evangelical as in ‘charismatic’ or ‘Pentecostal’; some still use that word in its original sense to indicate spreading the Gospel (the ‘Evangel’). Luther purposely called the Lutheran Church the Evangelical Church to distinguish it from the Roman Catholic Church. It is still called that in Germany. Canada and the US also have Lutheran denominations with ‘Evangelical’ — in the classic sense — in their names, e.g. Evangelical Lutheran Church in America (ELCA).
You can read more about the history of Evangelicalism here:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evangelicalism
I am vaguely interested in your last paragraph — saying you have never heard of a Christian who was not born again. Maybe you have always attended an evangelical (modern sense) church?
Here is a Reformed (Calvinist) take on being ‘born again’. I wrote about a Reformed pastor and professor’s point of view. He was brought up in a Southern Baptist church which was very much into being born again and members’ testimonies. Please read Dr Clark’s post (to which I refer) and what his Reformed readers have to say in the comments, if you have time:
Note that he says:
‘Praise God many covenant children never remember when they did not believe. They feel no need to embellish their personal stories because they don’t live in an ecclesiastical culture where that sort of narrative is highly valued. Here is a concrete, practical difference between Reformed piety and conversionist, revivalist piety. The focus of Reformed piety is on the gospel and the gospel tells me that what matters most of all is not what has happened in me but what happened for me, outside of me, in salvation history. What matters most is that I believe it now.’
Most other mainstream Christian denominations — Catholics, Anglicans, Lutherans — agree doctrinally. Reformed churches include Presbyterian churches (using the Westminster Confessions of Faith (1646)) and the Baptist churches which follow the London Baptist Confession of Faith (1689).
It is useful to read church history — Wikipedia (yes, I know it is much derided) can give you a good start on the basics. All the articles include further links where you can go for more information.
Thanks so much for reading through the Forbidden Bible Verses and for your kind comments!
LikeLike
October 4, 2010 at 4:55 pm
Christopher
Thanks for all that information, it was interesting to read through. It’s good to see how much you know about church history and it inspires me to study more. But to my mind it didn’t really answer my question. In John 3:3, Jesus says that we must be born again to enter the Kingdom of God.
This is what I was referring to – the point when we become in a relationship with Jesus, the point when we accept Him, however you believe that may come to be, and the change it brings to your life. I do understand the tenets of Calvinism and what Calvinists believe. I wanted to make a point about how God changes our lives entirely and dramatically, and the Alpha Course is one enterprise He wonderfully uses to do so. I’m actually not too interested in debating Calvinism vs Arminianism vs anything else. What does make me sad is when God is doing something huge and amazing, which brings in such an amazing harvest to His Kingdom, and people sling mud at it because it’s not in line with their own exact theology. That’s the point I was trying to make. Alpha is an introductory course. People who don’t know Jesus take Alpha, hopefully come to faith, and then learn more, and get to hone their more exact personal views later. Even if there were some problems in the Alpha Course, so long as it’s not teaching some completely false gospel, God is always bigger and His Holy Spirit is still able to work through it.
I know the Alpha Course back-to-front, and have studied everything it contains for a long time outside of the course during my own walk with God, and I don’t think it contains any poor teaching. I certainly don’t think there’s anything in Alpha that could possibly lead to loss of salvation or could be considered a false gospel. Otherwise, I wouldn’t be involved. Or I would at least discuss my different point of view during the discussion time.
Well, that’s my view anyway. I think the fact that I’m just not a Calvinist means that we will unfortunately continue to disagree! I can easily understand how you’d believe differently and that’s cool. I completely understand the paramount importance of any church initiative teaching the gospel accurately. I understand your concerns about Alpha, and I think it is of course extremely important to hear all voices in the debate, so although I still strongly disagree with your article, I do seriously appreciate it.
But my original cause for alarm with your article were its inaccuracies about Alpha teaching, and its negativity, and although I’m really enjoying talking to you, and you’re definitely stimulating me to think these things through in a positive way, I feel those two points still stand. Sorry to end on a negative note. I am trying to learn to be more friendly in my disagreements! Your friendly approach is a good example for me.
God bless, Christopher
LikeLike
October 4, 2010 at 4:58 pm
churchmouse
Thanks so much, Christopher, for the exchange of thoughts!
God bless you!
Churchmouse
LikeLike
March 26, 2012 at 11:35 am
catholictruth
For the life of me I can’t find any way to contact the blog author privately – intensely irritating. I’d like to reproduce quite a bit of the above (very good) article in our newsletter and would, of course, attribute it, give a link etc. But I need to know quickly – say, yesterday!
LikeLike
March 26, 2012 at 12:04 pm
churchmouse
Thanks, Catholictruth. Just comment on here to ask — permission granted! I look forward to reading your article! 🙂
LikeLike