Guilty as sin, free as a bird — America is a great country. — William Charles Ayers
Yesterday, Churchmouse Campanologist provided background on a friend of President Obama’s. His name is Bill Ayers. (Photo courtesy of The Jawa Report.)
How do we know that the two are good friends? We have some hints from Verum Serum from October 2008:
Obama and his wife were associated with Ayers and his wife from at least 1995 when Obama was hired to run the Chicago Annenberg Challenge (for which Ayers wrote the grant and served on the board) to 2001 when Ayers was serving on the board of the Woods foundation with Obama…
Barack Obama’s name was listed on the Chicago Annenberg Challenge’s Board of Directors in 2000. But before that, in 1998 (highlights mine):
Under Obama and Ayers, the CAC distributed over $100 million dollars in an effort to place race, class, language and culture at the center of public school [curricula]. That’s why Obama, as head of the CAC, declined to fund an Algebra initiative (which received funds from other Challenge sites around the nation but not in Chicago), but found money for the South Shore African Village Collaborative …
In addition to applauding a teacher whose goal seems to be to inculcate students of Mexican descent with a sense of grievance at America, the CAC was strongly against standardized testing and English immersion teaching. Barack Obama, presumably, agreed with all of this. I say presumably because the press hasn’t asked him about any of it.
If Barack Obama wants to claim he didn’t know about Ayers’ terrorist history, fine. I don’t believe it for a second, but let’s forget the distant past and focus on the recent past instead. It’s hard for me to imagine anything more hostile to America’s attempt to become a color blind society than telling impressionable kids in middle school that their race is central to their identities. Under Barack Obama, that’s what the CAC was about. It was Bill Ayers’ vision but Barack Obama was the man who implemented it. Ayers (the new, more respectable education expert) and Obama were ideological soul mates a mere ten years ago. Let’s just talk about that for a while, shall we?
Then, there’s this on another Verum Serum entry on the same day, ‘Crossing Paths Daily’:
Bill Ayers and Barack Obama shared an office. Ayers’ Small Schools Workshop, the one Obama directed all that money to is located at 115 S. Sangamon Street, Chicago, Illinois 60607 …
I’m going to suggest that two guys working in the same building for a period of years probably crossed paths pretty often. For all we know, they had lunch together on a daily basis. Maybe, in an effort at conservation, they were even carpool buddies. After all, Ayers is a guy from Obama’s neighborhood…
Update: … Also, Obama was a state senator from 1996-2004. However, he still likely spent some significant time at the Sangamon street address, especially in 1995. But even after his election he would presumably be working on his CAC duties at the Sangamon office, not from some other location…
Conservative Politics Today has a complete Ayers-Dohrn-Obama timeline here.
Now, onto Prairie Fire, as presented here (excerpts follow):
Ayers is now a respected, mainstream, mild-mannered and popular professor, so obviously his political views couldn’t have been that extreme.
This essay disproves all of these claims.Ayers was not simply protesting “against” the Vietnam War. Firstly, he wasn’t against war in principle, he was agitating for the victory of the communist forces in Vietnam. In other words: He wasn’t against the war, he was against our side in the war.
He may have escaped conviction [see previous post for allegations] due to a legal technicality (the prosecutors failed to get a warrant during some of their surveillance of the Weather Underground), but this in no way means that Ayers was factually innocent of the crimes. As has been widely reported, after the case against him was dropped, Ayers decribed himself as “guilty as hell, free as a bird.”
Just because Ayers tries to appear respectable now doesn’t mean that he wasn’t a violent revolutionary in the past. In fact, as the text of Prairie Fire shows, Ayers was one of the most extreme extremists in American political history.
Just out of interest, note the similarity between Bill Ayers’s cover design, which I understand is his creative graphic, and Obama’s roundel, pictured at right.
Quotes from Prairie Fire:
We are a guerrilla organization. We are communist women and men, underground in the United States for more than four years.
Our intention is to disrupt the empire, to incapacitate it, to put pressure on the cracks, to make it hard to carry out its bloody functioning against the people of the world, to join the world struggle, to attack from the inside.
Revolutionary war will be complicated and protracted. It includes mass struggle and clandestine struggle, peaceful and violent, political and economic, cultural and military, where all forms are developed in harmony with the armed struggle.
We need a revolutionary communist party in order to lead the struggle, give coherence and direction to the fight, seize power and build the new society.
Other Prairie Fire facts:
the Weather Underground dedicated the book to Robert F. Kennedy’s killer Sirhan Sirhan, among many other now-obscure ’60s-era radicals, criminals and revolutionaries.
Stated objective: ‘Our final goal is the destruction of imperialism, the seizure of power, and the creation of socialism. Our strategy for this stage of the struggle is to organize the oppressed people of the imperial nation itself to join with the colonies in the attack on imperialism. This process of attacking and weakening imperialism involves the defeat of all kinds of national chauvinism and arrogance; this is a precondition to our fight for socialism…
‘Socialism is the total opposite of capitalism/imperialism. It is the rejection of empire and white supremacy. Socialism is the violent overthrow of the bourgeoisie, the establishment of the dictatorship of the proletariat, and the eradication of the social system based on profit. Socialism means control of the productive forces for the good of the whole community instead of the few who live on hilltops and in mansions. Socialism means priorities based on human need instead of corporate greed. Socialism creates the conditions for a decent and creative quality of life for all.’
Meanwhile, the North Vietnamese communists, whom William Ayers was glorifying and praising, themselves imprisoned and tortured for over five years a young pilot by the name of John McCain. Here’s a newly discovered video of McCain taken in January of 1968 as he lay injured in a North Vietnamese prisoner-of-war hospital shortly after his capture. What’s heart-rending about it is that he does not yet know that he will spend the next five years being tortured by William Ayers’ comrades
Currently, Ayers is a scheduled speaker at colleges and universities across America. He may or may not have ghostwritten Obama’s Dreams of My Father. Whatever he does, it is likely that he adopts the following philosophy, as he explained here in a 2002 interview for College Radio:
… I’m as much an anarchist as I am a Marxist, which is to say you know I find a lot of the ideas in anarchism appealing …
Is one of those regrets that I took extreme measures against the United States at a time of tremendous crisis? No it is not. I don’t regret that. The people of the world are being exploited and oppressed and militarized by the great imperialist powers led by the United States. That is the situation today in my view. It’s a situation we should all be horrified at and we should all oppose.
One of Ayers’s favourite books for education majors and teachers to read is Brazilian Paolo Freire’s Pedagogy of the Oppressed. Freire also wrote the popular Education as the Practice of Freedom. DrKate’sView explains it to you here:
Both of these books call for an educational system that ‘teaches’ through presenting capitalism as the root of oppression of all individuals. It links the root of peasant experience to capitalism, and essentially, America. ‘Pedagogy’ is a style of instruction …
For example … the word ‘tractor’ not just taught [in terms of how to] spell the word and pronounce it, it is linked to why you do or do not have a tractor, how it contributes to the village economy, and who is preventing you from having it.
Freire is a popular icon and instructor of all Marxist educators and politicians, and radical leftists in the United States, particularly Bill Ayers and Bernadine Dohrn, the SDS …
‘Progressive’ educators in the United States have locked onto Freire, whose very pedagogy derives from a Marxist philosophy … Our entire history as a people and nation is boiled down to capitalism preying on the poor and the rest of the world. It is essentially a denigration of and an attack on individual liberties.
All the more reason to find out what education majors and your children are learning at school.
11 comments
October 10, 2009 at 9:15 am
Cinzia
Once again, very interesting articles Churchmouse.
Obama is beginning to look very sinister indeed. At the very least, a complete enigma. Time will tell I guess.
Hopefully we are all wrong … that it is not his intention to turn the US into a Communist regime.
That Obama Blue Book was quite a shock!! It actually really exists!!
I thought when you told me about it in one of your earlier comments, that you were joking there for a second … then I go and click on your link to Amazon.com and there it is!!
I read all 68 comments from people who had read this “useful handbook of Obama quotes” and I was pleased to see that none of them thought it was anything great at all. Many did compare it to Mao’s red book and were quite disgusted.
Perhaps all these things Obama is doing are beginning to help wake up America.
Wishing you a great weekend, and thanks again for all the great work you do in bringing up all these informative stories.
LikeLike
October 10, 2009 at 1:39 pm
churchmouse
So sorry for the delay here — my Better Half got to the PC before I did today!!
Wow — you’re a better person than I — reading all 68 comments about the One’s ‘Blue Book’. Good — I’m glad most reviews were negative.
Re ‘all things Obama’ — I did read this weekend a quote by TS Eliot that said that once someone wins the Nobel prize, they never do anything else of import — we can but hope in this case! 🙂
(For those who aren’t aware, President Obama won the Nobel Peace Prize.)
Finally, you are so welcome, Cinzia — I produce this blog for loyal and **thinking** readers like YOU! 🙂 I’m pleased to bring a little sunshine in to disinfect the news. (A paraphrase of Justice Brandeis’s saying, ‘Sunlight is the best disinfectant’.)
Hope you have a good weekend, too! Tune in next week — you’ll see where the American CHD donations are headed this year!
All the very best and God bless!
C
LikeLike
October 10, 2009 at 1:35 pm
toutniquer
Ayers may have helped write prairie fire in the 1960s but he’s certainly just a wienery liberal now and therefore bears no significance. Obama has nothing to do with communism or radical ideas or else he wouldn’t be ****ing president of the biggest tough dude countries of capitalism in the world.
LikeLike
October 10, 2009 at 1:45 pm
churchmouse
Hi, Toutniquer — I won’t edit your name, although I know what it means. I have often told people the nicest sounding obscenities are in French.
I did edit your message somewhat. Not sure if you believe in capitalism or not, but I doubt the Administration and Mr Ayers do. And, I’m not sure about the President, given his family history, which is well documented on other blogs. All the same, thanks for your comment.
LikeLike
October 10, 2009 at 7:08 pm
Gabriella
Hi, Churchmouse, your posts are such eyeopeners! 🙂
(but I must admit I wasn’t happy when Obama was elected).
I cannot believe someone who hasn’t done anything for his country yet, let alone for the world, has won the Nobel prize 😦
Gosh – what peace? He’s actually sent more soldiers to Afghanistan. He’s changed nothing of Bush’s foreign policy at all – so, why the prize?
I’m baffled.
The prize givers should have warned us that the peace prize now goes for ‘plans’ and ‘promises’ rather than actions – I have a world peace plan on my desk … 😉
Toutniquer, Obama does have some very radical ideas but this is not why the Americans voted him – they didn’t seem much interested in his ideas – they voted him solely because they were blaming Bush for the financial crisis.
ps: I always read your posts even if I don’t leave a comment and thank you for leaving intelligent comments on my blog every now and again, I appreciate it. 🙂
LikeLike
October 10, 2009 at 11:56 pm
churchmouse
Thanks, Gabriella, for your comment and for the very kind comments!! 🙂
You are right — ‘anyone but Bush’ — but the Hillary Clinton story still makes people angry. That’s another story — there’s a film about how her delegates were intimidated into changing votes to Obama. I may do a separate post on that — so unfair, even if one didn’t support Hillary. The Democratic Party is not the same as it was even several years ago — it’s now ‘progressive’ — with all that entails as my posts have examined.
And Bush wasn’t 100% to blame for the financial crisis. It goes back to the early 1990s and Democrats. That, too, is another story and a half.
I don’t know what to think about the Nobel Peace Prize — I don’t think it is what it used to be, either. A lot of people are wondering what Obama did to deserve it. Yes, I can imagine you have a world peace plan drawn up — and what a blessing it would be if it were implemented! 🙂
Well, the Red Series tells you what you need to know about where the US is today. There’s more next week.
Have a good Sunday — hope Mass will be okay 😉
God bless you!
C
LikeLike
October 10, 2009 at 10:20 pm
Cinzia
Hi Churchmouse, I heard it yesterday that Obama was honoured with the Nobel Peace prize.
So, I gather that these days the Nobel Peace Prize goes to people IN ANTICIPATION that they will earnestly work hard to bring about peace in war-torn nations, AND try their hardest to prevent wars where they seem likely to happen? and stuff like that? Particularly if they have the power to do just that. Obama has all the power in the world.
That’s a powerful message he should have understood when accepting the prize.
He definitely didn’t win it BECAUSE of anything he has done already in this regard.
Therefore: BO CERTAINLY HAS HIS WORK CUT OUT FOR HIM.
And if this does not come about it will mean, most unfortunately, that Nobel Prizes will have become a joke (to say the least) like many other once noble aspects of life that have now lost credibility and have been smeared with corruption, political agendas, greed and lies.
Having said that, it still does NOT seem right to me that a Nobel Prize be given to someone before they have actually achieved anything of real value or of any worth in that given field.
I mean, by that same token, they could give me the Nobel Prize for Literature then, in anticipation that I write one of the greatest books in history … without having the least concern that so far I haven’t even written a short article for a magazine …
LikeLike
October 11, 2009 at 12:02 am
churchmouse
You’re too funny, Cinzia! Your comment is **brilliant** — but the last paragraph has me in stitches!! 😆
You’re right, and people are puzzled as to why Obama would have won the Nobel Peace Prize. I don’t know how they really choose the winners now. I’m going to go investigate and see what I can find out.
Agreed also that many people cannot see what Obama has achieved, particularly where peace is concerned.
I’ll try to get something in for next week — I’m as confused as you and Gabriella are!
Have a good Sunday — Extraordinary Rite for you? 🙂
God bless you!
C
LikeLike
October 11, 2009 at 1:18 am
Cinzia
The simple truth is that so far, Obama has achieved absolutely nothing – and that does not only refer to “peace.” His Health Care Bill was anything but an “achievement” for example … and his famous speeches are full of cliches, borrowed ideas and high sounding phrases that are essentially empty.
Methinks I will actually purchase that blue book just to see how far his “crap” goes and to what extent he is tricking and lying to the American people.
Somehow I don’t trust this guy. And to put it bluntly, I am disgusted that he was given the Nobel Peace Prize.
No Tridentine Mass for us today – but the next best thing … the beautiful Mass at St Patrick’s Cathedral tonight at 6.30pm.
Have a lovely Sunday and God bless.
ps: I must inform the prize-givers that I have a spectacular book planned sitting on my desk, and the initial draft is fully laid out in my mind ……. 🙂
LikeLike
October 11, 2009 at 5:36 pm
Abby
http://backyardconservative.blogspot.com/2009/10/bill-ayers-no-dream.html
I don’t know if you’ve heard about this story that broke last week here in the US, but I found it to be very interesting. Not surprising, since many have already connected the dots that lie between Ayers and Obama.
The inriguing thing is, that Ayers appears to be trying desperately to get some attention from the media since it seems that Obama has “thrown him under the bus” – a trend it would seem in the Obama camp.
I will be coming back to read all of your political related articles.
Once again Churchmouse… excellent work!!! 🙂
LikeLike
October 11, 2009 at 8:28 pm
churchmouse
Wow, Abby, I hope your theory is correct, because I wish the lady had had some audio to go with. I know it’s hard for honest people to think on their feet — one of my ‘faults’, too — but … we’re just not ‘trained’ like that, either in childhood or adulthood. Well, I suppose it was a spontaneous meeting. You know though, that, being the Type of Person He Is, he’ll wriggle out of it in some way.
I could see from the first releases of the story that he has some room to manoeuvre. If she can put a stop to that, fabulous! An extra prayer going up tonight … 🙂
LikeLike